AI summary · arXiv: 2303.04642v1 · q-fin.CP

Forecasting the movements of Bitcoin prices: an application of machine learning algorithms

Hakan Pabuccu, Serdar Ongan, Ayse Ongan

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 08 Mar. 2023 14 pages, 2 figures and 15 tables License: CC BY 4.0 Also in: fr

The essentials

  • Cryptocurrencies, particularly Bitcoin, are controversial and complex technological innovations in today's financial system
  • Forecasting the movements of Bitcoin prices with a high degree of accuracy is important research
  • Four different Machine Learning (ML) algorithms were applied simultaneously: Support Vector Machines (SVM), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Naive Bayes (NB), and Random Forest (RF)
  • Logistic regression (LR) was used as a benchmark model for comparison purposes
  • Nine technical input parameters were used, including closing prices, high and low prices for computing technical indicators such as simple 14-day moving average, simple 14-day weighted moving average, momentum, stochastic K%, stochastic D%, relative strength index(RSI)
  • The study applies four different ML algorithms simultaneously to compare their performances and uses both existing continuous datasets and discrete datasets created specifically for this study
  • The study aims to understand which ML algorithm offers higher forecasting performance in continuous and discrete datasets separately and comparatively
  • RF has the highest forecasting performance in the continuous dataset while NB has the lowest performance. On the other hand, ANN has the highest performance while NB has the lowest in the discrete dataset.
  • Using a discrete dataset improves overall forecasting performance across all models estimated.
  • A validation dataset consisting of 100 Bitcoin series between June 2020–October 2020 was used to compare model performances with benchmark LR statistics using t-tests.
  • Accuracy statistics were calculated for both continuous and discrete datasets.
  • This study provides valuable insights into the forecasting of Bitcoin prices using ML algorithms.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Cryptocurrencies Bitcoin Machine Learning Forecasting Performance

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
Cryptocurrencies, particularly Bitcoin, have emerged as one of the most controversial and complex technological innovations in today's financial system. The ability to forecast the movements of Bitcoin prices with a high degree of accuracy has become an important area of research. This study aims to achieve this objective by applying four different Machine Learning (ML) algorithms simultaneously, namely, Support Vector Machines (SVM), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Naive Bayes (NB), and Random Forest (RF). Additionally, logistic regression (LR) is used as a benchmark model for comparison purposes. The study uses nine technical input parameters that were previously identified by Armano et al. (2005), Atsalakis & Valavanis (2009), Kara et al. (2011), and Kim (2003). These parameters include closing prices, high and low prices for computing technical indicators such as simple 14-day moving average, simple 14-day weighted moving average, momentum, stochastic K%, stochastic D%, relative strength index(RSI). The study differs from previous studies in three aspects. Firstly, it applies four different ML algorithms simultaneously to compare their performances. Secondly, it uses both existing continuous datasets and discrete datasets created specifically for this study. Finally, the study aims to understand which ML algorithm offers higher forecasting performance in continuous and discrete datasets separately and comparatively. The empirical findings reveal that RF has the highest forecasting performance in the continuous dataset while NB has the lowest performance. On the other hand, ANN has the highest performance while NB has the lowest in the discrete dataset. Furthermore, using a discrete dataset improves overall forecasting performance across all models estimated. To validate these findings further, a validation dataset consisting of 100 Bitcoin series between June 2020–October 2020 was used to compare model performances with benchmark LR statistics using t-tests. Accuracy statistics were calculated for both continuous and discrete datasets. In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the forecasting of Bitcoin prices using ML algorithms. The use of both continuous and discrete datasets along with the application of multiple ML algorithms contributes to a better understanding of which algorithm offers higher forecasting performance.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 1

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.