The Relationship Between Insulin Resistance Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio

Authors: Alicia Shin

arXiv: 2205.08308v2 - DOI (q-bio.QM)
12 pages, 6 figures
License: CC0 1.0

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2205.08308v2

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
Chronic inflammation is increasingly recognized as a contributing factor to the pathogenesis of various diseases, and one of its markers, high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), has been associated with increased mortality and morbidity risk. Insulin resistance (IR) has been suggested as a potential associate factor in preclinical studies, but epidemiological studies investigating the association between NLR and IR are scarce and have only included diabetes mellitus patients rather than the general population. This study aimed to determine if there is a direct correlation between NLR and IR in the US general population. The sample for this study consisted of 3,307 individuals from the general population provided by the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) value was calculated to evaluate insulin resistance, and the relationship between NLR and HOMA-IR values was investigated through bivariate and multivariate linear regression analyses. As insulin use could result in inaccurate HOMA-IR estimation, subgroup analyses were conducted after excluding insulin users. After exclusions based on fasting glucose levels exceeding 140 mg/dL, white blood cell counts over 10,000 WBCs in collected blood samples, or NLR over 9 which could be possible outliers due to abnormal figures, 3,375 samples remained. During analysis an additional 68 insulin users were removed as they could be a confounding variable due to their unsteady insulin concentration in blood depending on when they receive treatment. The results showed that there was a relationship between NLR and IR when insulin users were included in the analysis with a beta coefficient value of 0.010 (95% confidence interval [CI] of 0.003-0.017). However, when insulin users were excluded from the analysis due to their potential confounding effect on HOMA-IR estimation, the beta value decreased to 0.004 (95% CI of -0.006-0.015). The statistical significance was not reached when age, sex, and body mass index were adjusted for in the multivariate analyses. In conclusion, there is no visible relationship between IR and NLR in the general population; IR might not explain the variation of NLR value in healthy people, and further studies are needed to reveal associated factors for high NLR values. The NHANES data source provided a representative sample of the US population; exclusions based on abnormal figures ensured accurate analysis; however limitations include potential confounding variables not accounted for in this study as well as lack of longitudinal data to establish causality between NLR and IR.
AI-generated keywords: Chronic inflammation

AI-generated Key Points

  • Chronic inflammation is linked to various diseases
  • High neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a marker of chronic inflammation and associated with increased mortality and morbidity risk
  • Insulin resistance (IR) has been suggested as a potential associate factor in preclinical studies
  • Epidemiological studies investigating the association between NLR and IR are scarce and have only included diabetes mellitus patients rather than the general population
  • This study aimed to determine if there is a direct correlation between NLR and IR in the US general population
  • The sample for this study consisted of 3,307 individuals from the general population provided by the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)
  • Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) value was calculated to evaluate insulin resistance, and the relationship between NLR and HOMA-IR values was investigated through bivariate and multivariate linear regression analyses
  • After exclusions based on fasting glucose levels exceeding 140 mg/dL, white blood cell counts over 10,000 WBCs in collected blood samples, or NLR over 9 which could be possible outliers due to abnormal figures, 3,375 samples remained.
  • There is no visible relationship between IR and NLR in the general population; IR might not explain the variation of NLR value in healthy people.
  • Further studies are needed to reveal associated factors for high NLR values.
  • The NHANES data source provided a representative sample of the US population; exclusions based on abnormal figures ensured accurate analysis; however limitations include potential confounding variables not accounted for in this study as well as lack of longitudinal data to establish causality between NLR and IR.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: Aim: There is increasing interest in the role of chronic inflammation on pathogenesis of various disease, and one of its markers, high NLR is associated with various mortality and morbidity risk. Insulin resistance (IR) might be one potential associate factors, as suggested in preclinical studies. However, epidemiological studies are scarce which investigated the association between NLR, and insulin resistance (IR) and they included only diabetes mellitus patients, not the general population. This study aims to determine if there is a direct correlation between NLR and IR in the US general population. Methods: The sample consists of 3,307 from general population, provided by National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) value was calculated to evaluate insulin resistance. We investigated the relationship between their NLR and HOMA-IR values by bivariate and multivariate linear regression analyses. As insulin use could results in inaccurate HOMA-IR estimation, we excluded them and ran the analyses in subgroup analyses. Results: There was a relationship shown when insulin users were included, having a beta coefficient value of 0.010 (95% confidence interval [CI] of 0.003-0.017). However, when insulin users were excluded, the beta value decreased to 0.004 (95% CI of -0.006-0.015). The statistical significance was not reached when age, sex, and body mass index were adjusted for in the multivariate analyses. Conclusion: There is no visible relationship between IR and NLR in the general population. IR might not explain the variation of NLR value in healthy people, and further studies are needed to reveal the associated factor of high NLR.

Submitted to arXiv on 13 May. 2022

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.