AI summary · arXiv: 2007.08464v2 · q-bio.TO

Effects of different feeding frequencies on growth, feed utilisation, digestive enzyme activities and plasma biochemistry of gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) fed with different fishmeal and fish oil dietary levels

S. Busti (Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences University of Bologna), A. Bonaldo (Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences University of Bologna), F. Dondi (Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences University of Bologna), D. Cavallini (Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences University of Bologna), M. Yufera (Instituto de Ciencias Marinas de Andalucía), N. Gilannejad (Instituto de Ciencias Marinas de Andalucía), F. J. Moyano (Department of Biology and Geology Universidad de Almería), P. P Gatta (Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences University of Bologna),

and 1 more authorL. Parma (Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences University of Bologna)

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 14 Jul. 2020 License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

The essentials

  • Feeding frequency during the on-growing phase of Mediterranean aquaculture has received little attention
  • A study investigated the effects of different feeding frequencies on gilthead sea bream
  • Three feeding frequencies were tested: one meal per day, two meals per day, and three meals per day
  • Feeding frequency did not significantly affect overall performance or feed efficiency
  • Pepsin activity decreased in fish receiving more than one meal a day, particularly in low fishmeal diets
  • Trypsin levels decreased with an increasing number of meals only under low fishmeal/fish oil diet
  • Plasma parameters related to nutritional and physiological conditions were not affected by feeding frequency
  • Fish fed a single daily meal with high fishmeal/fish oil level exhibited higher plasma creatinine levels
  • Gilthead sea bream can maximize feed utilization regardless of the number of meals provided
  • Findings could be valuable for optimizing fish growth and reducing feeding costs in Mediterranean aquaculture.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Feeding Frequency Gilthead Sea Bream Mediterranean Aquaculture Digestive Enzyme Activity Plasma Biochemistry

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
In the context of Mediterranean aquaculture, the manipulation of feeding frequency during the on-growing phase has received little attention. To address this gap, a study was conducted to investigate the effects of different feeding frequencies on the growth, digestive enzyme activity, feed digestibility, and plasma biochemistry of gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata). The fish were fed diets with varying levels of fishmeal (FM) and fish oil (FO), and three different feeding frequencies were tested: one meal per day, two meals per day, and three meals per day. Over a period of 109 days, triplicate groups of fish were fed isonitrogenous and isolipidic extruded diets by a fixed ration. The results showed that feeding frequency did not have significant effects on overall performance or feed efficiency in gilthead sea bream fed high or low FM and FO dietary levels. However, pepsin activity appeared to decrease in fish receiving more than one meal a day without an accompanying increase in alkaline protease production; this effect was particularly evident in fish fed on low FM diets. Trypsin levels decreased significantly with an increasing number of meals only under the low FMFO diet; this suggests that consecutive meals may have amplified the potential trypsin inhibitor effect of the vegetable meal-based diet used. The study also examined plasma parameters related to nutritional and physiological conditions and found that they were not affected by feeding frequency. However, fish fed a single daily meal with a high FMFO level exhibited higher levels of plasma creatinine; although this increase was within physiological values it correlated with higher protein efficiency observed with this diet. Based on these findings it can be concluded that gilthead sea bream is capable of maximizing feed utilization regardless of the number of meals provided. This information could be valuable for planning feeding activities at the farm level to optimize fish growth and reduce feeding costs. Overall, this study contributes to a better understanding of the effects of feeding frequency on the performance and physiology of gilthead sea bream in Mediterranean aquaculture.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

Compare with the PDF

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.