Detecting and Explaining Crisis

Authors: Rohan Kshirsagar, Robert Morris, Sam Bowman

Accepted at CLPsych, ACL workshop. 8 pages, 5 figures

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1705.09585v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
In their paper titled "Detecting and Explaining Crisis," Rohan Kshirsagar, Robert Morris, and Sam Bowman explore the detection and explanation of crisis in social media text. They note that individuals on social media may reveal themselves to be in various states of crisis such as suicide, self-harm, abuse, or eating disorders. Detecting these crises automatically and accurately can have profound consequences for mental health professionals who can use these techniques to identify individuals who may be in need of support or intervention based on their online behavior. However, detecting a general state of crisis without explaining why has limited applications. Therefore, the authors propose an explanation as a coherent, concise subset of the text that rationalizes the crisis detection. To achieve this goal, they explore several methods to detect and explain crises using a combination of neural and non-neural techniques. The authors evaluate these techniques on a unique dataset obtained from Koko, an anonymous emotional support network available through various messaging applications. They annotate a small subset of the samples labeled with crisis with corresponding explanations. The authors find that their best technique significantly outperforms the baseline for both detection and explanation of crises in social media text. Overall, this study highlights the importance of combining machine learning techniques with human expertise to improve our understanding and response to mental health crises in digital spaces.
AI-generated keywords: Crisis Detection Explanation Social Media Text Machine Learning Mental Health

AI-generated Key Points

  • Individuals on social media may reveal themselves to be in various states of crisis such as suicide, self-harm, abuse, or eating disorders.
  • Detecting these crises automatically and accurately can have profound consequences for mental health professionals who can use these techniques to identify individuals who may be in need of support or intervention based on their online behavior.
  • The authors propose an explanation as a coherent, concise subset of the text that rationalizes the crisis detection.
  • To achieve this goal, they explore several methods to detect and explain crises using a combination of neural and non-neural techniques.
  • The authors evaluate these techniques on a unique dataset obtained from Koko, an anonymous emotional support network available through various messaging applications.
  • They annotate a small subset of the samples labeled with crisis with corresponding explanations.
  • The authors find that their best technique significantly outperforms the baseline for both detection and explanation of crises in social media text.
  • Overall, this study highlights the importance of combining machine learning techniques with human expertise to improve our understanding and response to mental health crises in digital spaces.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: Individuals on social media may reveal themselves to be in various states of crisis (e.g. suicide, self-harm, abuse, or eating disorders). Detecting crisis from social media text automatically and accurately can have profound consequences. However, detecting a general state of crisis without explaining why has limited applications. An explanation in this context is a coherent, concise subset of the text that rationalizes the crisis detection. We explore several methods to detect and explain crisis using a combination of neural and non-neural techniques. We evaluate these techniques on a unique data set obtained from Koko, an anonymous emotional support network available through various messaging applications. We annotate a small subset of the samples labeled with crisis with corresponding explanations. Our best technique significantly outperforms the baseline for detection and explanation.

Submitted to arXiv on 26 May. 2017

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.