AI summary · arXiv: 1304.6613v1 · q-bio.TO

Ovarian volume throughout life: a validated normative model

Thomas W. Kelsey, Sarah K. Dodwell, A. Graham Wilkinson, Tine Greve, Claus Y. Andersen, Richard A. Anderson, W. Hamish B. Wallace

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 23 Apr. 2013 14 pages, 7 figures License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

  • Ovarian volume is a useful indicator of ovarian reserve and can be used for diagnosing and managing various disorders in women of reproductive age.
  • It is also being investigated as a screening tool for ovarian cancer.
  • There has been a lack of a normative model for how ovarian volume changes throughout life.
  • Researchers conducted an extensive search and generated the first model of ovarian volume from conception to 82 years old.
  • Age alone accounts for 69% of the variation in ovarian volume.
  • On average, ovarian volume increases from 0.7 mL at 2 years old to 7.7 mL at 20 years old before gradually declining to around 2.8 mL at menopause and continuing to decrease with age.
  • This normative model provides valuable insights into normal values and ranges for ovarian volume throughout life, which will have significant implications for diagnosing and managing gynecological and reproductive conditions in females from birth to menopause and beyond.
  • The study fills an important knowledge gap by providing comprehensive understanding on how ovarian volume changes across different stages of life, contributing to improved clinical decision-making and enhancing our understanding of female reproductive health.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Ovarian Volume Normative Model Reproductive Function Gynecological Conditions Menopause

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
The measurement of ovarian volume has been shown to be a useful indirect indicator of the ovarian reserve in women of reproductive age for the diagnosis and management of a number of disorders. It is also being investigated as a screening tool for ovarian cancer. However, there has been a lack of a normative model that provides information on how ovarian volume changes throughout life. To address this gap, researchers conducted an extensive search of the published literature and used their own data from multiple sources to generate and validate the first model of ovarian volume from conception to 82 years old. The analysis included 59,994 individuals and showed that age alone accounts for 69% of the variation in ovarian volume. On average, it increases from 0.7 mL at 2 years old to 7.7 mL at 20 years old before gradually declining to around 2.8 mL at menopause and continuing to decrease with age. This validated normative model provides valuable insights into normal values and ranges for ovarian volume throughout life which will have significant implications for diagnosing and managing various gynecological and reproductive conditions in females from birth to menopause and beyond. This study fills an important knowledge gap by providing comprehensive understanding on how ovarian volume changes across different stages of life which will contribute to improved clinical decision-making and enhance our understanding of female reproductive health.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

Compare with the PDF

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.