Studies on access: a review

Authors: Philip M. Davis

18 pages, 2 tables

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 0912.3953v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The article titled "Studies on Access: A Review" by Philip M. Davis provides a comprehensive overview of the empirical literature on access to scholarly information. The author focuses on surveys of authors, article download statistics and citation analysis to analyze the trends and patterns in accessing scholarly information. The study highlights the importance of open access policies and their impact on increasing the visibility and accessibility of research articles. It also discusses the challenges faced by researchers in accessing scholarly information such as paywalls, limited availability of resources, and lack of awareness about open access policies. Additionally, it emphasizes the need for collaboration between publishers, libraries, and researchers to ensure equitable access to scholarly information. Overall, this review offers valuable insights into the current state of access to scholarly information and provides recommendations for improving accessibility in academia.
AI-generated keywords: Access Scholarly Information Open Access Policies Paywalls Limited Availability

AI-generated Key Points

  • The article "Studies on Access: A Review" by Philip M. Davis provides an overview of the empirical literature on access to scholarly information.
  • The author uses surveys of authors, article download statistics, and citation analysis to analyze trends and patterns in accessing scholarly information.
  • Open access policies are important for increasing visibility and accessibility of research articles.
  • Challenges faced by researchers include paywalls, limited availability of resources, and lack of awareness about open access policies.
  • Collaboration between publishers, libraries, and researchers is necessary for equitable access to scholarly information.
  • The review offers valuable insights into the current state of access to scholarly information and provides recommendations for improving accessibility in academia.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: A review of the empirical literature on access to scholarly information. This review focuses on surveys of authors, article download and citation analysis.

Submitted to arXiv on 20 Dec. 2009

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.