# Studies on access: a review

**Authors:** Philip M. Davis  
**arXiv:** [0912.3953](https://arxiv.org/abs/0912.3953)  
**Date:** 2009-12-20  
**Summary page:** https://www.summarizepaper.com/en/paper/0912.3953v1/

## Key points

- The article "Studies on Access: A Review" by Philip M. Davis provides an overview of the empirical literature on access to scholarly information.
- The author uses surveys of authors, article download statistics, and citation analysis to analyze trends and patterns in accessing scholarly information.
- Open access policies are important for increasing visibility and accessibility of research articles.
- Challenges faced by researchers include paywalls, limited availability of resources, and lack of awareness about open access policies.
- Collaboration between publishers, libraries, and researchers is necessary for equitable access to scholarly information.
- The review offers valuable insights into the current state of access to scholarly information and provides recommendations for improving accessibility in academia.

## Summary

The article titled "Studies on Access: A Review" by Philip M. Davis provides a comprehensive overview of the empirical literature on access to scholarly information. The author focuses on surveys of authors, article download statistics and citation analysis to analyze the trends and patterns in accessing scholarly information. The study highlights the importance of open access policies and their impact on increasing the visibility and accessibility of research articles. It also discusses the challenges faced by researchers in accessing scholarly information such as paywalls, limited availability of resources, and lack of awareness about open access policies. Additionally, it emphasizes the need for collaboration between publishers, libraries, and researchers to ensure equitable access to scholarly information. Overall, this review offers valuable insights into the current state of access to scholarly information and provides recommendations for improving accessibility in academia.