Matching Workloads to Blackwell: Power-Resolved Benchmarking of NVIDIA B200 and B300 across HPC and AI Workloads
Authors: Mohsen Zand, Trung Dac Nguyen, H. Birali Runesha
Abstract
We evaluate NVIDIA B200 and B300 (Blackwell Ultra) GPUs on two independent eight-GPU clusters, spanning computer-vision inference and training, LLM inference with Llama-3-8B and 70B~\cite{llama3}, and six production HPC codes. The B300 is not a uniform successor to the B200: it trails by up to 5.6$\times$ on convolutional inference, 8$\times$ on 3D vision transformer training, 24--27\% on 70B LLM throughput, and 16$\times$ on double-precision Quantum ESPRESSO. We resolve the convolutional deficit using per-GPU board power rather than throughput alone: on the affected workloads the B300 draws only 36--53\% of its 1100\,W envelope, whereas on ViT-Large, which it wins, both parts saturate at 95--97\% of TDP. Because our harness keeps inputs resident in device memory, a host-side data pipeline is excluded by construction, localizing the cause to per-kernel cost. Two B300 nodes of identical silicon differ by 2.1$\times$ in time-to-first-token solely from a development vLLM build. We give per-workload procurement guidance.
The papers around it, by date and closeness
Higher is closer to this paper; left is older. Lines join papers close to each other: groups of lines are sub-topics. Select a point to see why it is there. Back to the summary of this paper
Papers around this one
Ranked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.
Closest papers
-
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing UnitNorman P. Jouppi, Cliff Young, Nishant Patil et al. · 2017 · Hardware Architecture · cited 5,584 times · AI summary available
The TPU study measures datacenter neural-network inference performance and energy, while this paper benchmarks Blackwell GPUs across AI and HPC workloads.
Abstract
Many architects believe that major improvements in cost-energy-performance must now come from domain-specific hardware. This paper evaluates a custom ASIC---called a Tensor Processing Unit (TPU)---deployed in datacenters since 2015 that accelerates the inference phase of neural networks (NN). The heart of the TPU is a 65,536 8-bit MAC matrix multiply unit that offers a peak throughput of 92 TeraOps/second (TOPS) and a large (28 MiB) software-managed on-chip memory. The TPU's deterministic execution model is a better match to the 99th-percentile response-time requirement of our NN applications than are the time-varying optimizations of CPUs and GPUs (caches, out-of-order execution, multithrea…
-
Benchmarking CPU, GPU, and ML Power-Flow Solvers from 14 to 70,000 BusesBenjamin Donnot, Sami Tazi, Eva Boguslawski et al. · 2026 · Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing · AI summary available
The power-flow study compares CPU, GPU, and learned solvers for grid computation, unlike this paper’s Blackwell hardware and workload benchmarking.
In short
Optimized parallel CPU and batched GPU physics solvers match or exceed tested GNN power-flow surrogates in throughput while delivering substantially higher accuracy.
-
From Words to Watts: Benchmarking the Energy Costs of Large Language Model InferenceSiddharth Samsi, Dan Zhao, Joseph McDonald et al. · 2023 · Computation and Language · cited 376 times · AI summary available
From Words to Watts measures the energy costs of LLM inference, while this paper evaluates Llama inference throughput and GPU power.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have exploded in popularity due to their new generative capabilities that go far beyond prior state-of-the-art. These technologies are increasingly being leveraged in various domains such as law, finance, and medicine. However, these models carry significant computational challenges, especially the compute and energy costs required for inference. Inference energy costs already receive less attention than the energy costs of training LLMs -- despite how often these large models are called on to conduct inference in reality (e.g., ChatGPT). As these state-of-the-art LLMs see increasing usage and deployment in various domains, a better understanding of their resourc…
-
Not All GPUs Are Created Equal: Characterizing Variability in Large-Scale, Accelerator-Rich SystemsPrasoon Sinha, Akhil Guliani, Rutwik Jain et al. · 2022 · Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing · cited 47 times · Not summarized yet
Not All GPUs Are Created Equal studies performance variation among accelerator-rich systems, while this paper compares performance and power across B200 and B300 clusters.
Abstract
Scientists are increasingly exploring and utilizing the massive parallelism of general-purpose accelerators such as GPUs for scientific breakthroughs. As a result, datacenters, hyperscalers, national computing centers, and supercomputers have procured hardware to support this evolving application paradigm. These systems contain hundreds to tens of thousands of accelerators, enabling peta- and exa-scale levels of compute for scientific workloads. Recent work demonstrated that power management (PM) can impact application performance in CPU-based HPC systems, even when machines have the same architecture and SKU (stock keeping unit). This variation occurs due to manufacturing variability and th…
-
MIGPerf: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Deep Learning Training and Inference Workloads on Multi-Instance GPUsHuaizheng Zhang, Yuanming Li, Wencong Xiao et al. · 2023 · Machine Learning · preprint, not peer reviewed · cited 10 times · Not summarized yet
MIGPerf provides a benchmark tool and experiments for GPU training and inference, whereas this paper benchmarks workloads on B200 and B300.
Abstract
New architecture GPUs like A100 are now equipped with multi-instance GPU (MIG) technology, which allows the GPU to be partitioned into multiple small, isolated instances. This technology provides more flexibility for users to support both deep learning training and inference workloads, but efficiently utilizing it can still be challenging. The vision of this paper is to provide a more comprehensive and practical benchmark study for MIG in order to eliminate the need for tedious manual benchmarking and tuning efforts. To achieve this vision, the paper presents MIGPerf, an open-source tool that streamlines the benchmark study for MIG. Using MIGPerf, the authors conduct a series of experiments,…
-
Benchmarking and Dissecting the Nvidia Hopper GPU ArchitectureWeile Luo, Ruibo Fan, Zeyu Li et al. · 2024 · Hardware Architecture · cited 110 times · AI summary available
Benchmarking and Dissecting the Nvidia Hopper GPU Architecture characterizes GPU performance and architecture, a hardware-benchmarking approach also used here for Blackwell.
Abstract
Graphics processing units (GPUs) are continually evolving to cater to the computational demands of contemporary general-purpose workloads, particularly those driven by artificial intelligence (AI) utilizing deep learning techniques. A substantial body of studies have been dedicated to dissecting the microarchitectural metrics characterizing diverse GPU generations, which helps researchers understand the hardware details and leverage them to optimize the GPU programs. However, the latest Hopper GPUs present a set of novel attributes, including new tensor cores supporting FP8, DPX, and distributed shared memory. Their details still remain mysterious in terms of performance and operational char…
-
Efficient Large-Scale Language Model Training on GPU ClustersDeepak Narayanan, Mohammad Shoeybi, Jared Casper et al. · 2021 · Computation and Language · cited 1,465 times · AI summary available
Efficient Large-Scale Language Model Training on GPU Clusters addresses distributed LLM training efficiency, while this paper benchmarks Pangu-Weather training and other workloads on GPUs.
Abstract
Large language models have led to state-of-the-art accuracies across a range of tasks. However, training these large models efficiently is challenging for two reasons: a) GPU memory capacity is limited, making it impossible to fit large models on a single GPU or even on a multi-GPU server; and b) the number of compute operations required to train these models can result in unrealistically long training times. New methods of model parallelism such as tensor and pipeline parallelism have been proposed to address these challenges; unfortunately, naive usage leads to fundamental scaling issues at thousands of GPUs due to various reasons, e.g., expensive cross-node communication or idle periods w…
-
DynamoLLM: Designing LLM Inference Clusters for Performance and Energy EfficiencyJovan Stojkovic, Chaojie Zhang, Íñigo Goiri et al. · 2024 · Artificial Intelligence · cited 226 times · AI summary available
DynamoLLM studies performance and energy efficiency in LLM inference clusters, while this paper measures LLM inference throughput and GPU power.
Abstract
The rapid evolution and widespread adoption of generative large language models (LLMs) have made them a pivotal workload in various applications. Today, LLM inference clusters receive a large number of queries with strict Service Level Objectives (SLOs). To achieve the desired performance, these models execute on power-hungry GPUs causing the inference clusters to consume large amount of energy and, consequently, result in excessive carbon emissions. Fortunately, we find that there is a great opportunity to exploit the heterogeneity in inference compute properties and fluctuations in inference workloads, to significantly improve energy-efficiency. However, such a diverse and dynamic environm…
Go further
How are these papers found?
We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.
Updated on 2 November 2026.