Approximating the Euclidean Ball by Polytopes: Surprising Rates in High Dimensions
Authors: Yegor Gorodzha, Steven Hoehner, Gil Kur
Abstract
We provide sharp estimates on the number of vertices needed to approximate the Euclidean unit ball $B_d\subset\mathbb R^d$ with relative symmetric-difference volume error at most $\varepsilon\in(0,1)$. We show that the minimum vertex budget $N_\varepsilon(d)$ satisfies $$\log N_\varepsilon(d)\asymp d\log\left(1+\frac1{\varepsilon\sqrt d}\right).$$ In particular, $\exp(O(\sqrt d/\varepsilon))$ vertices suffice for every $\varepsilon\in(0,1)$ and all sufficiently large $d$. We also prove that achieving a fixed error $\varepsilon\in(0,1)$ requires at least $Ω\bigl((\tfrac{1+\varepsilon}{2\sqrt\varepsilon})^{d-1}\bigr)$ facets, an exponential number in $d$. We extend our vertex approximation result to Gaussian symmetric-difference error, and give a positive answer to the question of De, Nadimpalli, and Servedio about subexponential vertex complexity for approximating Euclidean balls. We also disprove a Macbeath-type extremality principle for unrestricted vertex approximation. Whereas the ball uniformly maximizes the inscribed approximation error among all convex bodies (Macbeath, 1951), we show that approximating the hypercube $[-1,1]^d$ to relative error $\varepsilon$, with $δ:=1-\varepsilon$, requires $N\ge\fracδ{2}\exp(Ω(δ^2d/\log^2(2/δ)))$ vertices whenever $d\ge16\log(2/δ)$. Thus, when $d$ is large, the cube is harder to approximate than the ball in this sense. Finally, we determine the sharp dimensional order of the classical Laguerre-Delone triangulation number, showing that $\mathrm{ldel}_{d-1}=Θ(d^{-1/2})$ as $d\to\infty$. This improves both the upper bound of Ludwig, Schütt, and Werner and the lower bound of Böröczky by a factor of order $\sqrt d$. By classical asymptotic approximation theorems (Ludwig, 1999), this improvement applies to every convex body in $\mathbb R^d$ with $C^2$ boundary and positive Gaussian curvature.
The papers around it, by date and closeness
Higher is closer to this paper; left is older. Lines join papers close to each other: groups of lines are sub-topics. Select a point to see why it is there. Back to the summary of this paper
Papers around this one
Ranked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.
Closest papers
-
Exponential improvements in Rado's covering problemG. Dall'Ara, A. Dumitrescu · 2026 · Not summarized yet
Exponential improvements in Rado's covering problem bounds disjoint volume coverage by unit Euclidean balls, rather than approximating a ball by a polytope.
Abstract
Let $B^d$ denote the $d$-dimensional Euclidean ball of unit radius. What is the largest constant $f(B^d) \in [0,1]$ with the property that every finite collection $\mathcal{C}$ of unit balls in $\mathbb{R}^d$ admits a disjoint sub-collection $\mathcal{S}$ occupying at least a fraction $f(B^d)$ of the volume of $\mathcal{C}$? This problem was first raised by T. Rad\'o in 1928, for axis-parallel squares in the plane; the author was motivated by a classical covering lemma in real analysis due to Vitali. The case of Euclidean balls was first considered by R. Rado in 1949. Until last year the best known estimates on $f(B^d)$ for unit balls where very far apart: \[ (1+\epsilon_d) 3^{-d} \leq f(B^d…
-
Local Optimality of the d-cube for Laplacian EigenvaluesBraxton Osting, Robert Viator · 2026 · Not summarized yet
Local Optimality of the d-cube for Laplacian Eigenvalues studies cube shape and spectral properties, not its vertex complexity for volume approximation.
Abstract
For each $d \ge 2$ we prove that the unit $d$-cube $\square_d \subset \mathbb{R}^d$ is, on the class $\mathcal{P}$ of convex polytopes combinatorially equivalent to a $d$-cube, (i) a strict local minimizer of the scale-invariant isoperimetric ratio $I(\Omega) = \tfrac{P(\Omega)^d}{|\Omega|^{d-1}}$, with $P$ the perimeter, (ii) a strict local minimizer of the volume-normalized first Dirichlet eigenvalue $\bar\lambda(\Omega) = |\Omega|^{2/d}\lambda_1(\Omega)$, and (iii) a strict local maximizer of the volume-normalized first Neumann eigenvalue $\bar\mu(\Omega) = |\Omega|^{2/d}\mu_1(\Omega)$. The method is a shape-derivative Hessian analysis adapted to the hyperoctahedral symmetry of the cube. …
-
Quasipolynomial density bounds for $K$-point configurations in $\mathbb{Z}^d$Andrew Lott, Á. Magyar, N. R. Ponagandla · 2026 · Not summarized yet
Quasipolynomial density bounds for K-point configurations in Z^d uses simplex geometry in a density problem, not polytope approximation of the ball.
Abstract
Let $d,K,N\in \mathbb{N}$ with $K\geq 3$ and $d\geq 4K+4$. Let $\Delta\subset \mathbb{Z}^d$ be the vertex set of a nondegenerate $(K-1)$-simplex, and let $A\subseteq[N]^d$ contain no nontrivial similar copy of $\Delta$. We prove that \[ |A|\ll_{\Delta,d} N^d\exp\!\left(-c_{\Delta,d}\sqrt{\log N}\right) \] improving upon a polylogarithmic bound due to Magyar. We perform a density increment argument using the circle method, and we introduce a ``cut operator''method to decouple the weighted exponential sum over the system of quadratic forms describing the simplex. Our proof combines ideas from graph theory, functional analysis, and the geometry of numbers. In the process, we apply Finner's frac…
-
Joint Lower Bounds for Zeroth-Order Nonconvex Optimization on Euclidean BallsHai-Han Zhang, Wen-Dao Wu, Chen-Heng Zhang et al. · 2026 · cited 3 times · Not summarized yet
Joint Lower Bounds for Zeroth-Order Nonconvex Optimization on Euclidean Balls studies query complexity on a ball, not geometric approximation by polytopes.
Abstract
We prove a joint stochastic zeroth-order lower bound for Goldstein stationarity on a Euclidean query ball, even when the ball is guaranteed to contain a stationary point. In dimension $d$, let $f=\mathbb{E}[F(\cdot;\xi)]$, assume $\mathbb{E}[\operatorname{Lip}(F(\cdot;\xi))^2]\le L_0^2$, and bound the initial objective gap over the ball by $\Delta$. For neighborhood radius $\delta>0$ and residual tolerance $\varepsilon>0$, our smooth hard family requires $\Omega(dL_0^2\Delta/(\delta\varepsilon^3))$ scalar evaluations for success probability $1/2$, against randomized adaptive algorithms that may retain and repeatedly query each sampled function. The result holds for $\varepsilon\le cL_0$, $\D…
-
Hyperbolic intersection graphs and (quasi)-polynomial timeSándor Kisfaludi-Bak · 2018 · Computational Geometry · cited 23 times · AI summary available
Hyperbolic intersection graphs and (quasi)-polynomial time studies ball graphs and algorithms in hyperbolic space, not Euclidean-ball approximation.
Abstract
We study unit ball graphs (and, more generally, so-called noisy uniform ball graphs) in $d$-dimensional hyperbolic space, which we denote by $\mathbb{H}^d$. Using a new separator theorem, we show that unit ball graphs in $\mathbb{H}^d$ enjoy similar properties as their Euclidean counterparts, but in one dimension lower: many standard graph problems, such as Independent Set, Dominating Set, Steiner Tree, and Hamiltonian Cycle can be solved in $2^{O(n^{1-1/(d-1)})}$ time for any fixed $d\geq 3$, while the same problems need $2^{O(n^{1-1/d})}$ time in $\mathbb{R}^d$. We also show that these algorithms in $\mathbb{H}^d$ are optimal up to constant factors in the exponent under ETH. This drop in d…
-
Tusnády's problem and online two-sample thinningYuhao Lei · 2026 · Combinatorics · AI summary available
Tusnády's problem and online two-sample thinning uses geometric discrepancy for point sets, rather than vertex or facet bounds for approximating a ball.
In short
The paper establishes sharp discrepancy bounds for Tusnády’s problem and online thinning, including a separation between prefix and terminal objectives.
-
Sharp Antipode-Neighbor Bounds in Every DimensionSamuel Korsky · 2026 · cited 1 time · Not summarized yet
Sharp Antipode-Neighbor Bounds in Every Dimension studies distances between point pairs in bounded-diameter sets, not approximation of convex bodies.
Abstract
Let $P\subset\mathbb R^d$ be finite with $\operatorname{diam}(P)\le1$. For $0<\varepsilon<1$, let $\mathcal N_\varepsilon(P)$ denote the number of ordered pairs at distance at most $\varepsilon$, including the diagonal, and let $\mathcal A_\varepsilon(P)$ denote the number of ordered pairs at distance at least $1-\varepsilon$. We prove the sharp bound \[ \mathcal N_\varepsilon(P)\gtrsim_d \varepsilon^{(d-1)/2}\mathcal A_\varepsilon(P) \] conjectured by Steinerberger (2025). More generally, the same inequality holds for finite positive Borel measures. The main input is a uniform $L^2$ estimate, at cap thickness comparable to lattice spacing, for a supporting-direction incidence operator. In g…
-
MINVO Basis: Finding Simplexes with Minimum Volume Enclosing Polynomial CurvesJesus Tordesillas, Jonathan P. How · 2020 · Computational Geometry · cited 50 times · AI summary available
MINVO Basis finds minimum-volume simplices enclosing polynomial curves, whereas this paper bounds vertex counts for volume approximation of the Euclidean ball.
Abstract
Outer polyhedral representations of a given polynomial curve are extensively exploited in computer graphics rendering, computer gaming, path planning for robots, and finite element simulations. Bézier curves (which use the Bernstein basis) or B-Splines are a very common choice for these polyhedral representations because their non-negativity and partition-of-unity properties guarantee that each interval of the curve is contained inside the convex hull of its control points. However, the convex hull provided by these bases is not the one with smallest volume, producing therefore undesirable levels of conservatism in all of the applications mentioned above. This paper presents the MINVO basis,…
Go further
How are these papers found?
We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.
Updated on 9 November 2026.