Exoplanetary Microlensing
Authors: B. Scott Gaudi (Ohio State University)
Abstract
Gravitational microlensing occurs when a foreground star happens to pass very close to our line of sight to a more distant background star. The foreground star acts as a lens, splitting the light from the source star into two images, which are typically unresolved. However, these images are also magnified, by an amount that depends on the angular lens-source separation. The relative lens-source motion results in a time-variable source magnification: a microlensing event. If the foreground star happens to host a planet with projected separation near the paths of these images, the planet will further perturb the images, resulting in a characteristic, short-lived signature of the planet. This chapter provides an introduction to the discovery and characterization of exoplanets with gravitational microlensing. The theoretical foundation of the method is reviewed, focusing on the phenomenology of planetary perturbations. The strengths and weakness of the microlensing technique are discussed, highlighting the fact that it is sensitive to low-mass planets with separations just beyond the snow line, orbiting stars located throughout the Galactic disk and foreground bulge. An overview of the practice of microlensing planet searches is given, with a discussion of some of the challenges with detecting and analyzing planetary perturbations. The chapter concludes with a review of the results that have been obtained to date, and a discussion of the near and long-term prospects for microlensing planet surveys. Ultimately, microlensing is potentially sensitive to multiple-planet systems containing analogs of all the solar system planets except Mercury, as well as to free floating planets, and will provide a crucial test of planet formation theories by determining the demographics of planets throughout the Galaxy.
The papers around it, by date and closeness
Higher is closer to this paper; left is older. Lines join papers close to each other: groups of lines are sub-topics. Select a point to see why it is there. Back to the summary of this paper
Papers around this one
Ranked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.
Closest papers
-
Detection of Extrasolar Planets by Gravitational MicrolensingDavid P. Bennett · 2009 · chapter 3 of Mason, J., 2008, Exoplanets, Edited by John Mason. Berlin: Springer, 2008. ISBN: 978-3-540-74007-0 · AI summary available
Abstract
Gravitational microlensing provides a unique window on the properties and prevalence of extrasolar planetary systems because of its ability to find low-mass planets at separations of a few AU. The early evidence from microlensing indicates that the most common type of exoplanet yet detected are the so-called "super-Earth" planets of ~10 Earth-masses at a separation of a few AU from their host stars. The detection of two such planets indicates that roughly one third of stars have such planets in the separation range 1.5-4 AU, which is about an order of magnitude larger than the prevalence of gas-giant planets at these separations. We review the basic physics of the microlensing method, and sh…
-
Detecting Multi-Planetary Systems with Gravitational Microlensing and the Roman Space TelescopeHossein Fatheddin, Sedighe Sajadian · 2023 · Earth and Planetary Astrophysics · AI summary available
Abstract
It is plausible that most of the Stars in the Milky Way (MW) Galaxy, like the Sun, consist of planetary systems, instead of a single planet. Out of the estimately discovered 3,950 planet-hosting stars, about 860 of them are known to be multiplanetary systems (as of March, 2023). Gravitational microlensing, which is the magnification in the light of a source star, due to a single or several lenses, has proven to be one of the most useful Astrophysical phenomena with many applications. Until now, many extrasolar planets (exoplanets) have been discovered through binary microlensing, where the lens system consists of a star with one planet. In this paper, we discuss and explore the detection of …
-
ROME/REA: A gravitational microlensing search for exo-planets beyond the snow-line on a global network of robotic telescopesYiannis Tsapras, R. A. Street, M. Hundertmark et al. · 2019 · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 131:124401 (12pp), 2019 December · AI summary available
Abstract
Planet population synthesis models predict an abundance of planets with semi-major axes between 1-10 au, yet they lie at the edge of the detection limits of most planet finding techniques. Discovering these planets and studying their distribution is critical to understanding the physical processes that drive planet formation. ROME/REA is a gravitational microlensing project whose main science driver is to discover exoplanets in the cold outer regions of planetary systems. To achieve this, it uses a novel approach combining a multi-band survey with reactive follow-up observations, exploiting the unique capabilities of the Las Cumbres Observatory (LCO) global network of robotic telescopes comb…
-
Microlensing Constraints on the Stellar and Planetary Mass FunctionsJennifer C. Yee, Scott J. Kenyon · 2025 · Earth and Planetary Astrophysics · AI summary available
Abstract
The mass function (MF) of isolated objects measured by microlensing consists of both a stellar and a planetary component. We compare the microlensing MFs of Gould et al (2022) and Sumi et al (2023) to other measurements of the MF. The abundance of brown dwarfs in the Sumi et al (2023) stellar MF is consistent with measurements from the local solar neighborhood (Kirkpatrick et al 2024). Microlensing free-floating planets ($\mu$FFPs) may may be free-floating or orbit host stars with semimajor axes $a\gtrsim 10~\mathrm{au}$ and therefore can constrain the populations of both free-floating planetary-mass objects and wide-orbit planets. Comparisons to radial velocity and direct imaging planet pop…
-
Imaging exoplanets with coronagraphic instrumentsRaphaël Galicher, Johan Mazoyer · 2023 · Comptes Rendus. Physique, Online first (2023), pp. 1-45 · AI summary available
Abstract
Exoplanetary science is a very active field of astronomy nowadays, with questions still opened such as how planetary systems form and evolve (occurrence, process), why such a diversity of exoplanets is observed (mass, radius, orbital parameters, temperature, composition), and what are the interactions between planets, circumstellar disk and their host star. Several complementary methods are used for the detection of exoplanets. Among these, imaging aims at the direct detection of the light reflected, scattered or emitted by exoplanets and circumstellar disks. This allows their spectral and polarimetric characterization. Such imaging remains challenging because of the large luminosity ratio (…
-
The Rossiter-McLaughlin effect reloaded: Probing the 3D spin-orbit geometry, differential stellar rotation, and the spatially-resolved stellar spectrum of star-planet systemsH. M. Cegla, C. Lovis, V. Bourrier et al. · 2016 · A&A 588, A127 (2016) · AI summary available
Abstract
When a planet transits its host star, it blocks regions of the stellar surface from view; this causes a distortion of the spectral lines and a change in the line-of-sight (LOS) velocities, known as the Rossiter-McLaughlin (RM) effect. Since the LOS velocities depend, in part, on the stellar rotation, the RM waveform is sensitive to the star-planet alignment (which provides information on the system's dynamical history). We present a new RM modelling technique that directly measures the spatially-resolved stellar spectrum behind the planet. This is done by scaling the continuum flux of the (HARPS) spectra by the transit light curve, and then subtracting the in- from the out-of-transit spectra…
-
Using planet migration and dust drift to weigh protoplanetary discsYinhao Wu, Clément Baruteau, Sergei Nayakshin · 2023 · Earth and Planetary Astrophysics · AI summary available
Abstract
ALMA has spatially resolved over 200 annular structures in protoplanetary discs, many of which are suggestive of the presence of planets. Constraining the mass of these putative planets is quite degenerate for it depends on the disc physical properties, and for simplicity a steady-state is often assumed whereby the planet position is kept fixed and there is a constant source of dust at the outer edge of the disc. Here we argue against this approach by demonstrating how the planet and dust dynamics can lift degeneracies of such steady-state models. We take main disc parameters from the well-known protoplanetary disc HD 163296 with a suspected planet at $R\approx 86$~au as an example. By runni…
-
Machine Learning for Exoplanet Detection in High-Contrast Spectroscopy: Revealing Exoplanets by Leveraging Hidden Molecular Signatures in Cross-Correlated Spectra with Convolutional Neural NetworksEmily O. Garvin, Markus J. Bonse, Jean Hayoz et al. · 2024 · Earth and Planetary Astrophysics · AI summary available
Abstract
The new generation of observatories and instruments (VLT/ERIS, JWST, ELT) motivate the development of robust methods to detect and characterise faint and close-in exoplanets. Molecular mapping and cross-correlation for spectroscopy use molecular templates to isolate a planet's spectrum from its host star. However, reliance on signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) metrics can lead to missed discoveries, due to strong assumptions of Gaussian independent and identically distributed noise. We introduce machine learning for cross-correlation spectroscopy (MLCCS); the method aims to leverage weak assumptions on exoplanet characterisation, such as the presence of specific molecules in atmospheres, to improve…
Go further
How are these papers found?
We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.
For now only among the papers summarized on this site: search again to add the prior work, the follow-ups and Semantic Scholar’s recommendations.