Search by
Refine results

Years refer to the arXiv submission date or the publication date. Journal and ORCID filters use indexed publication records.

    Include journals

    Match any selected journal.

    Exclude journals

    Exclude every selected journal.

    Clear filters

    Some sources are temporarily unavailable. Results may be incomplete; please try again shortly.

    Kimberly A. Smith-Jentsch
    Jay A. Conger
    John D. Sterman

    Abstract Research shows widespread misunderstanding of stocks and flows, even among highly educated adults. People fail to grasp that any stock rises (falls) when the inflow exceeds (is less than) the outflow. Rather, people often use the correlation heuristic , …

    Read the full abstract

    Abstract Research shows widespread misunderstanding of stocks and flows, even among highly educated adults. People fail to grasp that any stock rises (falls) when the inflow exceeds (is less than) the outflow. Rather, people often use the correlation heuristic , concluding that a system's output is positively correlated with its inputs. Although many argue that system dynamics training will help, evidence is scant. This paper reports an experiment with MIT graduate students to assess the impact of an introductory system dynamics course on intuitive understanding of accumulation. Results show large, statistically significant improvements in overall performance and a reduction in the prevalence of the correlation heuristic. Modest exposure to stocks and flows improves understanding of accumulation, at least among these highly educated adults. However, a minority still show evidence of correlational reasoning. The discussion considers additional experiments to deepen our knowledge of the training required to develop people's intuitive understanding of accumulation. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

    Chao Fu
    Zhijie Xu

    Abstract Large language models (LLMs) exhibit empirical scaling laws, yet the mechanistic origin of these power laws remains poorly understood. We propose a stochastic multiscale theory of LLM training dynamics, grounded in a formal analogy with nonequilibrium systems such as …

    Read the full abstract

    Abstract Large language models (LLMs) exhibit empirical scaling laws, yet the mechanistic origin of these power laws remains poorly understood. We propose a stochastic multiscale theory of LLM training dynamics, grounded in a formal analogy with nonequilibrium systems such as turbulence and cosmic structure formation, where scaling laws emerge naturally from scale-space transport processes. Central to the theory is a scale-dependent loss $L_r(r,s)$, the held-out loss when usable context is restricted to distance $r$ at training step $s$. Its negative gradient $E_X(r,s) \equiv -\partial L_r/\partial r$ defines a \emph{loss spectrum} in direct analogy with the turbulence energy spectrum. Training dynamics is modeled as a biased random walk with scale-dependent waiting time $\tau_r \propto r^{-\gamma}$ in $r$-space, governed by a Fokker-Planck equation whose exact solution yields an analytically tractable loss spectrum with inertial-range scaling $E_X \propto r^{-(1+\gamma)}$ and an exponential cutoff at an effective scale $r=\xi$. The key exponent $\gamma = \alpha_H/3 = 1/6$ is determined self-consistently from Heaps' law ($\alpha_H \approx 1/2$). Decomposing the total loss into $L_\infty(s)$ (the residual full-context loss, characterizing the \emph{breadth} of the learning frontier) and $\Delta L_r(s)$ (the \emph{depth} of context dependence), we identify a two-phase training dynamics that bifurcates at a critical step $s^*$ into two simultaneous modes: \textbf{Mode A} (downscale compression), with a shrinking effective scale $\xi_A \propto s^{-3/5}$ and growing $\Delta L_r \propto s^{+1/10}$; and \textbf{Mode B} (upscale frontier absorption), with an expanding scale $\xi_B \propto s^{+3/5}$ and decreasing $L_\infty \propto s^{-1/10}$. The theory directly predicts the empirical loss-vs-data scaling exponent $\alpha_D = \gamma/(2-2\gamma) = 1/10$, so that $L \propto D^{-\alpha_D}$. Treating model size $N$ as the effective Langevin time yields $\alpha_N = \lambda\gamma/(2-2\gamma)$, where the asymmetry parameter $\lambda \leq 1$ encodes the fraction of parameters contributing to learning; $\lambda = 3/4$ gives $\alpha_N = 3/40 \approx 0.075$, consistent with the empirical Kaplan value. The full scaling form $L(N,D) = [(N_c/N)^{\lambda} + D_c/D]^{\alpha_D}$ is recovered from the harmonic combination of two independent bottlenecks. The framework yields falsifiable predictions, including a universal loss spectrum $E_X \propto r^{-7/6}$, and provides diagnostics for long-context generalization, data selection, training curriculum, and architecture design.

    Jerry I. Porras, Brad Anderson
    Jay A. Conger
    Christopher Flinn, Ahu Gemici, Steven Laufer
    Meredith Downes