Search Results for « Performance »

Software systems continuously evolve due to new functionalities, requirements, or maintenance activities. In the context of software evolution, software refactoring has gained a strategic relevance. The space of possible software refactoring is usually very large, as it is given by the combinations of different refactoring actions that can produce software system alternatives. Multi-objective algorithms have shown the ability to discover alternatives by pursuing different objectives simultaneously. Performance of such algorithms in the context of software model refactoring is of paramount importance. Therefore, in this paper, we conduct a performance analysis of three genetic algorithms to compare them in terms of performance and quality of solutions. Our results show that there are significant differences in performance among the algorithms (e.g., PESA2 seems to be the fastest one, while NSGA-II shows the least memory usage).

Multiprocessor task scheduling is an important and computationally difficult problem. This paper proposes a comparison study of genetic algorithm and list scheduling algorithm. Both algorithms are naturally parallelizable but have heavy data dependencies. Based on experimental results, this paper presents a detailed analysis of the scalability, advantages and disadvantages of each algorithm. Multiprocessors have emerged as a powerful computing means for running real-time applications, especially where a uni-processor system would not be sufficient enough to execute all the tasks. The high performance and reliability of multiprocessors have made them a powerful computing resource. Such computing environment requires an efficient algorithm to determine when and on which processor a given task should execute. In multiprocessor systems, an efficient scheduling of a parallel program onto the processors that minimizes the entire execution time is vital for achieving a high performance. This scheduling problem is known to be NP- Hard. In multiprocessor scheduling problem, a given program is to be scheduled in a given multiprocessor system such that the program's execution time is minimized. The last job must be completed as early as possible. Genetic algorithm (GA) is one of the widely used techniques for constrained optimization.

The complexity of multimedia applications in terms of intensity of computation and heterogeneity of treated data led the designers to embark them on multiprocessor systems on chip. The complexity of these systems on one hand and the expectations of the consumers on the other hand complicate the designers job to conceive and supply strong and successful systems in the shortest deadlines. They have to explore the different solutions of the design space and estimate their performances in order to deduce the solution that respects their design constraints. In this context, we propose the modeling of one of the design space possible solutions: the software to hardware task migration. This modeling exploits the synchronous dataflow graphs to take into account the different migration impacts and estimate their performances in terms of throughput.

The term "performance portability" has been informally used in computing to refer to a variety of notions which generally include: 1) the ability to run one application across multiple hardware platforms; and 2) achieving some notional level of performance on these platforms. However, there has been a noticeable lack of consensus on the precise meaning of the term, and authors' conclusions regarding their success (or failure) to achieve performance portability have thus been subjective. Comparing one approach to performance portability with another has generally been marked with vague claims and verbose, qualitative explanation of the comparison. This paper presents a concise definition for performance portability, along with a simple metric that accurately captures the performance and portability of an application across different platforms. The utility of this metric is then demonstrated with a retroactive application to previous work.

The performance of cluster computing depends on how concurrent jobs share multiple data center resource types like CPU, RAM and disk storage. Recent research has discussed efficiency and fairness requirements and identified a number of desirable scheduling objectives including so-called dominant resource fairness (DRF). We argue here that proportional fairness (PF), long recognized as a desirable objective in sharing network bandwidth between ongoing flows, is preferable to DRF. The superiority of PF is manifest under the realistic modelling assumption that the population of jobs in progress is a stochastic process. In random traffic the strategy-proof property of DRF proves unimportant while PF is shown by analysis and simulation to offer a significantly better efficiency-fairness tradeoff.