Search Results for « Online Knapsack »

We investigate the online variant of the (Multiple) Knapsack Problem: an algorithm is to pack items, of arbitrary sizes and profits, in k knapsacks (bins) without exceeding the capacity of any bin. We study two objective functions: the sum and the maximum of profits over all bins. With either objective, our problem statement captures and generalizes previously studied problems, e.g. Dual Bin Packing [ 1 , 6 ] in case of the sum and Removable Knapsack [ 10 , 11 ] in case of the maximum. Following previous studies, we consider two variants, depending on whether the algorithm is allowed to remove items (forever) from its bins or not, and two special cases where the profit of an item is a function of its size, in addition to the general setting. We study both deterministic and randomized algorithms; for the latter, we consider both the oblivious and the adaptive adversary model. We classify each variant as either admitting O (1)-competitive algorithms or not. We develop simple O (1)-competitive algorithms for some cases of the max-objective variant believed to be intrac because only 1-bin deterministic algorithms were considered before.

The online knapsack problem is a classic online resource allocation problem in networking and operations research. Its basic version studies how to pack online arriving items of different sizes and values into a capacity-limited knapsack. In this paper, we study a general version that includes item departures, while also considering multiple knapsacks and multi-dimensional item sizes. We design a threshold-based online algorithm and prove that the algorithm can achieve order-optimal competitive ratios. Beyond worst-case performance guarantees, we also aim to achieve near-optimal average performance under typical instances. Towards this goal, we propose a data-driven online algorithm that learns within a policy-class that guarantees a worst-case performance bound. In trace-driven experiments, we show that our data-driven algorithm outperforms other benchmark algorithms in an application of online knapsack to job scheduling for cloud computing.

The online knapsack problem is a classic online resource allocation problem in networking and operations research. Its basic version studies how to pack online arriving items of different sizes and values into a capacity-limited knapsack. In this paper, we study a general version that includes item departures, while also considering multiple knapsacks and multi-dimensional item sizes. We design a threshold-based online algorithm and prove that the algorithm can achieve order-optimal competitive ratios. Beyond worst-case optimized algorithms, we also propose a data-driven online algorithm that can achieve near-optimal average performance under typical instances while guaranteeing the worst-case performance.

The online knapsack problem is a classic online resource allocation problem in networking and operations research. Its basic version studies how to pack online arriving items of different sizes and values into a capacity-limited knapsack. In this paper, we study a general version that includes item departures, while also considering multiple knapsacks and multi-dimensional item sizes. We design a threshold-based online algorithm and prove that the algorithm can achieve order-optimal competitive ratios. Beyond worst-case optimized algorithms, we also propose a data-driven online algorithm that can achieve near-optimal average performance under typical instances while guaranteeing the worst-case performance.

We analyze the competitive ratio of the proportional online knapsack problem with removal and limited recourse. In contrast to the classical online knapsack problem, packed items can be removed and a limited number of removed items can be re-inserted to the knapsack. The variant with removal only was analyzed by Iwama and Taketomi (ICALP, 2002). We show that even a single use of recourse can improve the performance of an algorithm. We give lower bounds for a constant number of k ≥ 1 uses of recourse in total, matching upper bounds for 1 ≤ k ≤ 3 , and a general upper bound for any value of k . For a variant where a constant number of k ≥ 1 uses of recourse can be used per step, we give tight bounds for all k ≥ 1 . We further look at a scenario where an algorithm is informed when the instance ends and give improved upper bounds in both variants for this case.

Imagine you are a computer scientist who enjoys attending conferences or workshops within the year. Sadly, your travel budget is limited, so you must select a subset of events you can travel to. When you are aware of all possible events and their costs at the beginning of the year, you can select the subset of the possible events that maximizes your happiness and is within your budget. On the other hand, if you are blind about the options, you will likely have a hard time when trying to decide if you want to register somewhere or not, and will likely regret decisions you made in the future. These scenarios can be modeled by knapsack variants, either by an offline or an online problem. However, both scenarios are somewhat unrealistic: Usually, you will not know the exact costs of each workshop at the beginning of the year. The online version, however, is too pessimistic, as you might already know which options there are and how much they cost roughly. At some point, you have to decide whether to register for some workshop, but then you are aware of the conference fee and the flight and hotel prices. We model this problem within the setting of online knapsack problems with estimates: in the beginning, you receive a list of potential items with their estimated size as well as the accuracy of the estimates. Then, the items are revealed one by one in an online fashion with their actual size, and you need to decide whether to take one or not. In this article, we show a best-possible algorithm for each estimate accuracy $δ$ (i.e., when each actual item size can deviate by $\pm δ$ from the announced size) for both the simple knapsack and the simple knapsack with removability.