5 references analysed. 1 serious problem 4 to fix

Publisher or catalogue metadata compared for 4 references. 0 unresolved references: this does not mean they are incorrect.

Corrected .bib

4 entries can be corrected. Untick below the corrections you do not want, then download.

Open in Overleaf: a new project prints every entry of the corrected .bib, to check that it compiles before replacing the .bib of your manuscript.

References

  • snider2020 · Room-temperature superconductivity in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride · 10.1038/s41586-020-2801-z

    Retracted This paper has been retracted. Remove it, or cite it as retracted. Retraction notice
    Correction published A correction to this paper has been published: check that it does not change what you cite. Correction
    Expression of concern The journal has published an expression of concern about this paper: check that you can still rely on it. Notice
  • kral2017 · Predictions for the secondary CO, C and O gas content of debris discs from the destruction of volatile-rich planetesimals · 10.1093/mnras/stx730

    Reference to correct Record found in Crossref
    • Year : 2016 → 2017
    Suggested corrected entry — review before using

    Your entry

    @article{kral2017,
      title={Predictions for the secondary CO, C and O gas content of debris discs from the destruction of volatile-rich planetesimals},
      author={Kral, Quentin and Matr{\`a}, Luca and Wyatt, Mark C. and Kennedy, Grant M.},
      journal={Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},
      volume={469},
      pages={521--550},
      year={2016}
    }

    Corrected

    @article{kral2017,
      title = {Predictions for the secondary CO, C and O gas content of debris discs from the destruction of volatile-rich planetesimals},
      author = {Kral, Quentin and Matr{\`a}, Luca and Wyatt, Mark C. and Kennedy, Grant M.},
      journal = {Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},
      volume = {469},
      pages = {521--550},
      year = {2017},
      doi = {10.1093/mnras/stx730},
    }

  • kral2017b · Predictions for the secondary CO, C and O gas content of debris discs from the destruction of volatile-rich planetesimals · 10.1093/mnras/stx730

    Duplicate The same paper as kral2017.
    Incomplete entry Added from the record that identifies it: volume = 469, pages = 521-550.
    Suggested corrected entry — review before using

    Your entry

    @article{kral2017b,
      title={Predictions for the secondary CO, C and O gas content of debris discs from the destruction of volatile-rich planetesimals},
      author={Kral, Q. and Matra, L. and Wyatt, M. C. and Kennedy, G. M.},
      journal={MNRAS},
      year={2017},
      doi={10.1093/mnras/stx730}
    }

    Corrected

    @article{kral2017b,
      title = {Predictions for the secondary CO, C and O gas content of debris discs from the destruction of volatile-rich planetesimals},
      author = {Kral, Q. and Matra, L. and Wyatt, M. C. and Kennedy, G. M.},
      journal = {MNRAS},
      year = {2017},
      doi = {10.1093/mnras/stx730},
      volume = {469},
      pages = {521-550},
    }

  • eht2022 · First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way · arXiv:2311.08680

    Final publication available Cited as a preprint, but published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6674
    Suggested corrected entry — review before using

    Your entry

    @misc{eht2022,
      title={First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way},
      author={{Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration}},
      year={2023},
      eprint={2311.08680},
      archivePrefix={arXiv}
    }

    Corrected

    @article{eht2022,
      title = {First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way},
      author = {{Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration}},
      year = {2022},
      eprint = {2311.08680},
      journal = {The Astrophysical Journal Letters},
      volume = {930},
      pages = {L12},
      doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/ac6674},
    }

  • marino2016 · Exocometary gas in the HD 181327 debris ring · 10.1093/mnras/stw1216

    Incomplete entry Added from the record that identifies it: doi = 10.1093/mnras/stw1216, volume = 460, pages = 2933-2944.
    Suggested corrected entry — review before using

    Your entry

    @article{marino2016,
      title={Exocometary gas in the HD 181327 debris ring},
      author={Marino, S. and Matr{\`a}, L. and Stark, C. and Wyatt, M. C. and Casassus, S. and Kennedy, G. and Rodriguez, D. and Zuckerman, B. and Perez, S. and Dent, W. R. F. and Kuchner, M. and Hughes, A. M. and Schneider, G. and Steele, A. and Roberge, A. and Donaldson, J. and Nesvold, E.},
      journal={Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},
      year={2016}
    }

    Corrected

    @article{marino2016,
      title = {Exocometary gas in the HD 181327 debris ring},
      author = {Marino, S. and Matr{\`a}, L. and Stark, C. and Wyatt, M. C. and Casassus, S. and Kennedy, G. and Rodriguez, D. and Zuckerman, B. and Perez, S. and Dent, W. R. F. and Kuchner, M. and Hughes, A. M. and Schneider, G. and Steele, A. and Roberge, A. and Donaldson, J. and Nesvold, E.},
      journal = {Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},
      year = {2016},
      doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw1216},
      volume = {460},
      pages = {2933-2944},
    }

Your LaTeX and your .bib

Missing from the .bib Your LaTeX cites these keys, which your .bib does not define: they will print as [?].

smith2021

Profile of your bibliography
  • Median age of the references: 9 years (from 2016 to 2023). 1 of 5 dated references is from the last five years.
  • 1 reference cited as a preprint. 5 of 5 references have a DOI or an arXiv identifier.
  • Most cited venues: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (3), Nature (1).

For information: referees often look at how recent the references are and how many are self-citations. Nothing here is an error.

Citations to check

4 sentences with citations read out of 6: those that attribute a result, a value or a method to a paper first. Each sentence is read with the abstracts of all the papers it cites; those flagged are read again against the full text of the papers when it may be read. A flagged citation may be right: check it in the paper. Full texts read: 1 of the 1 papers concerned (the others are closed to text mining or could not be fetched).

  • The paper says otherwise cited for a result · main.tex, line 15
    The shadow of the supermassive black hole at the centre of the Milky Way was first imaged with ALMA alone [eht2022].

    L’article indique que les observations ont été réalisées avec un réseau interférométrique mondial de huit télescopes, et non avec ALMA seul.

    These observations were conducted in 2017 using a global interferometric array of eight telescopes operating at a wavelength of λ = 1.3 mm.

    eht2022

    eht2022 · First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way
    Abstract

    We present the first Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) observations of Sagittarius A* (Sgr A$^*$), the Galactic center source associated with a supermassive black hole. These observations were conducted in 2017 using a global interferometric array of eight telescopes operating at a wavelength of $λ=1.3\,{\rm mm}$. The EHT data resolve a compact emission region with intrahour variability. A variety of imaging and modeling analyses all support an image that is dominated by a bright, thick ring with a diameter of $51.8 \pm 2.3$\,\uas (68\% credible interval). The ring has modest azimuthal brightness asymmetry and a comparatively dim interior. Using a large suite of numerical simulations, we demonstrate that the EHT images of Sgr A$^*$ are consistent with the expected appearance of a Kerr black hole with mass ${\sim}4 \times 10^6\,{\rm M}_\odot$, which is inferred to exist at this location based on previous infrared observations of individual stellar orbits as well as maser proper motion studies. Our model comparisons disfavor scenarios where the black hole is viewed at high inclination ($i > 50^\circ$), as well as non-spinning black holes and those with retrograde accretion disks. Our results provide direct evidence for the presence of a supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way galaxy, and for the first time we connect the predictions from dynamical measurements of stellar orbits on scales of $10^3-10^5$ gravitational radii to event horizon-scale images and variability