AI summary · arXiv: 1609.02521v1 · stat.ML

DiSMEC - Distributed Sparse Machines for Extreme Multi-label Classification

Rohit Babbar, Bernhard Shoelkopf

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 08 Sep. 2016 License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

  • DiSMEC is a framework for extreme multi-label classification with supervised learning and large-scale datasets.
  • The datasets exhibit fit to power-law distribution where most labels have very few positive instances in the data distribution.
  • Most state-of-the-art approaches use low-dimensional linear subspace to capture correlation among labels, but this can be violated in the presence of power-law distributed extremely large and diverse label spaces.
  • Unlike other methods, DiSMEC does not make any low rank assumptions on the label matrix and instead uses one versus rest linear classifiers coupled with explicit capacity control to control model size.
  • DiSMEC can learn classifiers for datasets consisting hundreds of thousands labels within few hours using double layer parallelization.
  • The explicit capacity control mechanism filters out spurious parameters which keep the model compact in size without losing prediction accuracy.
  • Empirical evaluation on publicly available real world datasets consisting up to 670,000 labels showed that DiSMEC significantly boosted prediction accuracies compared to SLECC and FastXML, with an absolute improvement of 10% and 15%, respectively.
  • Overall, DiSMEC presents a promising solution for extreme multi-label classification that does not rely on low rank assumptions and provides explicit capacity control while maintaining high prediction accuracy.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: DiSMEC extreme multi-label classification power-law distribution capacity control prediction accuracy

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
DiSMEC is a large-scale distributed framework for extreme multi-label classification which involves supervised learning with hundreds of thousands or even millions of labels. The datasets in this type of classification exhibit fit to power-law distribution where a large fraction of labels have very few positive instances in the data distribution. Most state-of-the-art approaches attempt to capture correlation among labels by embedding the label matrix to a low-dimensional linear subspace. However, this approach can be easily violated in the presence of power-law distributed extremely large and diverse label spaces. Unlike most state-of-the-art methods, DiSMEC does not make any low rank assumptions on the label matrix and instead uses one versus rest linear classifiers coupled with explicit capacity control to control model size. Using double layer parallelization, DiSMEC can learn classifiers for datasets consisting hundreds of thousands labels within few hours. The explicit capacity control mechanism filters out spurious parameters which keep the model compact in size without losing prediction accuracy. The authors conducted extensive empirical evaluation on publicly available real world datasets consisting up to 670,000 labels and compared DiSMEC with recent state of the art approaches such as SLEEC and FastXML. On some of the datasets, DiSMEC significantly boosted prediction accuracies - 10% better compared to SLECC and 15% better compared to FastXML, in absolute terms. Overall, DiSMEC presents a promising solution for extreme multi-label classification that does not rely on low rank assumptions and provides explicit capacity control while maintaining high prediction accuracy.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.