Running summarizing tools on a new article
Check the paper below, then start its synthesis.
The Mass of the Milky Way from the H3 Survey
Jeff Shen (University of Toronto, Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics), Gwendolyn M. Eadie (University of Toronto), Norman Murray (University of Toronto, Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics), Dennis Zaritsky (University of Arizona), Joshua S. Speagle, Yuan-Sen Ting, Charlie Conroy (Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian), Phillip A. Cargile (Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian), Benjamin D. Johnson (Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian), Rohan P. Naidu (Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian), J. Han (Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian)
Abstract: Abstract The mass of the Milky Way is a critical quantity that, despite decades of research, remains uncertain within a factor of two. Until recently, most studies have used dynamical tracers in the inner regions of the halo, relying on extrapolations to estimate the mass of the Milky Way. In this paper, we extend the hierarchical Bayesian model applied in Eadie & Juri to study the mass distribution of the Milky Way halo; the new model allows for the use of all available 6D phase-space measurements. We use kinematic data of halo stars out to 142 kpc, obtained from the H3 survey and Gaia EDR3, to infer the mass of the Galaxy. Inference is carried out with the No-U-Turn sampler, a fast and scalable extension of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. We report a median mass enclosed within 100 kpc of M ( < 100 kpc ) = 0.69 − 0.04 + 0.05 × 10 12 M ⊙ (68% Bayesian credible interval), or a virial mass of M 200 = M ( < 216.2 − 7.5 + 7.5 kpc ) = 1.08 − 0.11 + 0.12 × 10 12 M ⊙ , in good agreement with other recent estimates. We analyze our results using posterior predictive checks and find limitations in the model’s ability to describe the data. In particular, we find sensitivity with respect to substructure in the halo, which limits the precision of our mass estimates to ∼15%.