Running summarizing tools on a new article

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit remarkable generative capabilities but remain vulnerable to hallucinations—outputs that are fluent yet inaccurate, ungrounded, or inconsistent with source material. To address the lack of methodologically grounded surveys, this paper introduces a novel method-oriented taxonomy of hallucination mitigation strategies in text-based LLMs. The taxonomy organizes over 300 studies into six principled categories: Training and Learning Approaches, Architectural Modifications, Input/Prompt Optimization, Post-Generation Quality Control, Interpretability and Diagnostic Methods, and Agent-Based Orchestration. Beyond mapping the field, we identify persistent challenges such as the absence of standardized evaluation benchmarks, attribution difficulties in multi-method systems, and the fragility of retrieval-based methods when sources are noisy or outdated. We also highlight emerging directions, including knowledge-grounded fine-tuning and hybrid retrieval–generation pipelines integrated with self-reflective reasoning agents. This taxonomy provides a methodological framework for advancing reliable, context-sensitive LLM deployment in high-stakes domains such as healthcare, law, and defense.