Running summarizing tools on a new article

Abstract: ~~In obtaining the expression (11) the mass difference between the charged and neutral has been ignored.~2M.Adernollo and R. Gatto, Nuovo Cimento 44A, 282 (1966); see also J. Pasupathy and H, .E. Marshak, Phys.Rev. Letters 17, 888 (1966).~3The predicted ratio I.eq.|, '12)] from the current alge-bra is slightly larger than that (0.23%) obtained from the p-dominance model of Ref. 2. This seems to be true also in the other case of the ratio &(t) ~+m y}/ &(V V} calculated in Refs.12 and 14.