A bias in optical observations of high redshift luminous infrared galaxies

Authors: V. Charmandaris (Cornell University), E. Le Floc'h (CEA - Saclay), I. F. Mirabel (CEA - Saclay)

Astrophys.J. 600 (2003) L15-L18
To appear in the Astrophysical Journal Letters (4 pages 1 figure)
License: not stated (all rights reserved)

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: astro-ph/0311632v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The paper "A bias in optical observations of high redshift luminous infrared galaxies" presents evidence for the significant differences in morphology between the rest frame UV and 7micron mid-IR emission of two nearby violently interacting infrared luminous galaxies (LIRGs), VV114 and Arp299. The authors note that nearly all LIRGs are interacting systems and it is currently accepted that they dominate the IR emission at z>1. However, luminous IR galaxies located at z=1-2 could easily be detected as unresolved sources in deep optical/near-IR ground-based surveys, as well as upcoming 24micron surveys with the Space Infrared Telescope Facility. The authors demonstrate that the spatial resolution of these surveys will result in blending of the emission from unresolved interacting components, leading to a systematic underestimation of their dust content when observed optically. This paper highlights a potential bias in current observations of high redshift LIRGs due to limitations in observational techniques and emphasizes the importance of considering morphological differences when interpreting observations of LIRGs. It also highlights the need for improved observational techniques to accurately measure their properties.
AI-generated keywords: LIRGs Redshift Morphology Optical Observations Mid-IR Emission

AI-generated Key Points

  • The paper presents evidence for significant differences in morphology between rest frame UV and 7micron mid-IR emission of two nearby violently interacting infrared luminous galaxies (LIRGs), VV114 and Arp299.
  • Nearly all LIRGs are interacting systems and it is currently accepted that they dominate the IR emission at z>1.
  • Luminous IR galaxies located at z=1-2 could easily be detected as unresolved sources in deep optical/near-IR ground-based surveys, as well as upcoming 24micron surveys with the Space Infrared Telescope Facility.
  • The spatial resolution of these surveys will result in blending of the emission from unresolved interacting components, leading to a systematic underestimation of their dust content when observed optically.
  • This paper highlights a potential bias in current observations of high redshift LIRGs due to limitations in observational techniques and emphasizes the importance of considering morphological differences when interpreting observations of LIRGs.
  • It also highlights the need for improved observational techniques to accurately measure their properties.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: We present evidence for the dramatically different morphology between the rest frame UV and 7micron mid-IR emission of VV114 and Arp299, two nearby (z~0) violently interacting infrared luminous galaxies (LIRGs). Nearly all LIRGs are interacting systems and it is currently accepted that they dominate the IR emission at z>1. Luminous IR galaxies located at z=1-2 could easily be detected as unresolved sources in deep optical/near-IR ground based surveys, as well as in upcoming 24micron surveys with the Space Infrared Telescope Facility. We demonstrate that the spatial resolution of these surveys will result in blending of the emission from unresolved interacting components. An increased scatter will thus be introduced in the observed optical to mid-IR colors of these galaxies, leading to a systematic underestimation of their dust content.

Submitted to arXiv on 28 Nov. 2003

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.