AI summary · arXiv: 2610.26792v1 · hep-ph

First observation of weak magnetism in neutron decay

Miriam Camarasa-Domene, Martín González-Alonso, Martín Novoa-Brunet

Original paper Submitted to arXiv on 19 Oct. 2026 10 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables License: CC BY 4.0 Also in: fr

The essentials

Combining existing neutron-decay and superallowed-decay data reveals neutron weak magnetism at 5.1 sigma, consistent with the conserved vector current prediction.

Question

Can weak magnetism be isolated in free-neutron decay despite the degeneracy between its form factor and the axial-to-vector coupling ratio in beta-asymmetry measurements?

Method

The authors constrain the axial-to-vector ratio using a neutron lifetime of 878.36 ± 0.43 s and a superallowed corrected Ft value of 3070.01 ± 1.90 s. They combine this constraint with individual beta-asymmetry measurements in a global chi-squared fit using full expressions and experiment-specific electron-energy windows. They test alternative neutron datasets and use expected-count datasets mimicking two PERKEO III analyses to assess the additional information in the asymmetry’s energy dependence.

Findings

  • Result The global fit gives a weak-magnetism form factor of 4.47 ± 0.87, excluding zero at 5.1 sigma and agreeing with the CVC prediction of 4.71.
    See the passage in the paper
    Current data yield $g_{M}=4.47(87)$, in agreement with the CVC prediction of $4.71$ and excluding the absence of weak magnetism at the $5.1\sigma$ level.
  • Result Combining the neutron lifetime and superallowed Ft input with beta asymmetry breaks the degeneracy that previously prevented a separate weak-magnetism extraction.
    See the passage in the paper
    We show that this degeneracy is lifted by combining the $\beta$ asymmetry measurements with the neutron lifetime and the $\mathcal{F}t$ value of superallowed $0^{+}\to 0^{+}$ decays.
  • Result Across the tested dataset variations, all extracted values agree with CVC within one sigma and exclude zero with significances of 5.0–6.1 sigma.
    See the passage in the paper
    In all cases the extracted value is compatible with the CVC expectation within $1\sigma$, and the absence of WM is excluded with a significance ranging from $5.0\sigma$ to $6.1\sigma$.
  • Authors’ interpretation At present precision, the energy-averaged asymmetry captures nearly all available weak-magnetism information.
    See the passage in the paper
    At present precision, $\tilde{A}$ thus captures nearly all the available information on $g_{M}$.

Limitations

  • The neutron lifetime data contain a longstanding beam–bottle discrepancy exceeding four sigma.
    See the passage in the paper
    However, the two methods are in a long-standing tension exceeding $4\sigma$.
  • The spectral-information study uses simulated expected counts rather than public energy-resolved asymmetry data.
    See the passage in the paper
    As no public data for $A(E_{e})$ are available, we quantify the potential gain with expected-count (Asimov) datasets mimicking two PERKEO III analyses [43, 48].
  • The spectral analysis omits energy-dependent experimental systematics because bin-by-bin covariance information is unavailable.
    See the passage in the paper
    Energy-dependent experimental systematics are not modeled, since the bin-by-bin covariance is unavailable.

Why it matters

The authors present this as the first observation of weak magnetism in free-neutron decay, a system free of nuclear-structure complications. They argue that improved neutron measurements and nuclear corrections to the superallowed input can turn this observation into a precision Standard Model test.

Written by AI from the paper. Passages are checked word for word against the text we analysed; the rest may contain errors.

AI-generated keywords: Weak magnetism; Free-neutron beta decay; Conserved vector current; Beta asymmetry; Neutron lifetime

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
This paper investigates whether weak magnetism, a long-standing prediction of the conserved vector current (CVC) hypothesis, can be established experimentally in free-neutron beta decay. CVC relates the weak vector current to the electromagnetic current and predicts a weak-magnetism coupling, g_M, of 4.71, based on the proton and neutron magnetic moments. Although weak magnetism has been observed in nuclear beta decays, its extraction from neutron decay has been hindered by a parameter degeneracy: the beta asymmetry, which describes the correlation between neutron polarization and electron emission, depends on both g_M and the axial-to-vector coupling ratio, λ. Previous experimental analyses generally fixed weak magnetism at its predicted value when extracting λ. The authors resolve this degeneracy by combining beta-asymmetry measurements with the neutron lifetime and the corrected Ft value from superallowed nuclear beta decays. The lifetime and Ft value provide an independent constraint on λ, allowing the asymmetry to determine g_M. The baseline inputs are an Ft value of 3070.01 ± 1.90 seconds, obtained from an updated analysis of the aluminum-26m transition, and a neutron lifetime of 878.36 ± 0.43 seconds, based on bottle measurements selected by the Particle Data Group. Together, these yield λ = −1.27598 ± 0.00061. The baseline average beta asymmetry is −0.11958 ± 0.00021. A key methodological step is restoring the weak-magnetism dependence removed by experimental collaborations when applying CVC-based recoil corrections. The authors calculate the relevant energy averages using each experiment’s actual electron-energy window rather than the full allowed spectrum. They first develop a transparent, linearized extraction and then perform a global fit incorporating the full expressions, individual asymmetry measurements, and the small weak-magnetism contribution to the neutron lifetime. The principal result is g_M = 4.47 ± 0.87, which excludes g_M = 0 at 5.1 standard deviations and agrees with the CVC prediction within 0.3 standard deviations. The authors identify this as the first observation of weak magnetism in free-neutron decay. The superallowed Ft value, neutron lifetime, and beta asymmetry contribute comparably to the uncertainty. The simplified calculation yields a consistent result of g_M = 4.40 ± 0.87. To assess the impact of known inconsistencies among neutron measurements, the authors test several alternative dataset selections. Using only post-2012 asymmetry measurements yields g_M = 5.00 ± 0.82, corresponding to a significance of 6.1 standard deviations. Combining the most precise individual asymmetry and lifetime measurements gives g_M = 4.68 ± 0.81, or 5.8 standard deviations. Including lifetime measurements excluded from the baseline, including beam results, gives g_M = 4.63 ± 0.92, or 5.0 standard deviations. Across all alternatives considered, the significance ranges from 5.0 to 6.1 standard deviations, and the results remain compatible with CVC within one standard deviation. The paper also examines whether the energy dependence of the asymmetry could improve the extraction. Using simulated expected-count datasets modeled on PERKEO III analyses, the authors find that a full spectral fit reduces the uncertainty in g_M by only 3.2% or 6.8%, depending on the energy window. The energy-averaged asymmetry therefore retains nearly all the information available under the modeled conditions. The conclusions depend on the adopted theoretical framework, the nuclear corrections entering Ft, and the treatment of experimental tensions. The spectral study is approximate because public bin-by-bin asymmetry data and systematic covariance information are unavailable, and energy-dependent detector systematics are not modeled. Nevertheless, the analysis supports a robust observation within the assumptions examined. Improved lifetime and asymmetry measurements, together with better nuclear-structure corrections, could enable a more precise test of CVC and the Standard Model.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

Compare with the PDF

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Weekly letter Presented in "Particles, nuclei and gravitation this week" of 26 October 2026. Particles, nuclei and gravitation this week: Small effects, revealing tests
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
Talk about it in public Premium+ Press kit: release, questions, hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.