AI summary · arXiv: 2509.04540v3 · math.NT

A Trace-Path Integral Formula over Function Fields

Yan Yau Cheng

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 04 Sep. 2025 32 pages. Revised version with extra section for examples of the Trace-Path Integral formula in the case of an elliptic curve License: CC BY 4.0

The essentials

  • Yan Yau Cheng explores the relationship between arithmetic path integrals and the trace of the Frobenius action on a representation of the Heisenberg group in function fields.
  • The main result is an arithmetic analogue of trace-path integral formulae from quantum field theory, showing equivalence between an arithmetic path integral over $J[\ell]$ and the trace of the Frobenius action on $H(J[\ell])$ with a determined sign.
  • Cheng establishes connections between geometric quantization and physical theories, interpreting mathematical structures in terms of physical concepts.
  • Viewing $J[\ell]$ as fibred over a circle allows for discrete sum over Fq-rational points, replacing continuous integrals in traditional path integral formulations.
  • An arithmetic analogue to Hilbert space is constructed using global sections of a tensor power of the theta line bundle Θ, drawing parallels to geometric quantization techniques from physics.
  • The main theorem is proven through detailed evaluation and comparison between both sides of the equality, focusing on evaluating the trace side in Section 3 by decomposing $J[\ell]$ into Frq invariant symplectic subspaces.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Arithmetic path integrals

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
In this paper, titled "A Trace-Path Integral Formula over Function Fields," Yan Yau Cheng explores the relationship between arithmetic path integrals and the trace of the Frobenius action on a representation of the Heisenberg group in the context of function fields. The main result presented is an arithmetic analogue of trace-path integral formulae commonly found in quantum field theory. Specifically, Cheng demonstrates that an arithmetic path integral over the $\ell$-torsion of a Jacobian $J[\ell]$ is equivalent to the trace of the Frobenius action on a representation of the Heisenberg group $H(J[\ell])$, with an explicitly determined sign. The paper begins by establishing connections between geometric quantization and physical theories, laying out a framework for understanding how certain mathematical structures can be interpreted in terms of physical concepts. By viewing $J[\ell]$ as being fibred over a circle, Cheng introduces the notion of rational points in $J[\ell](Fq)$ as sections over this fibre bundle. This perspective allows for a discrete sum over all Fq-rational points of $J[\ell]$, replacing the continuous integral over all sections in traditional path integral formulations. Furthermore, Cheng delves into the construction of an arithmetic analogue to Hilbert space, which is represented by global sections of a tensor power of the theta line bundle Θ. Drawing parallels to geometric quantization techniques from physics, this construction provides insight into how mathematical structures can mirror physical phenomena. The main theorem presented in the paper is proven through a detailed evaluation of both sides of the equality and comparison between them. Section 3 focuses on evaluating the trace side of the equality, where Cheng defines and analyzes the space H as a representation of H(J[\ell]). By expressing the Frq action on H explicitly and studying g-invariant spaces within symplectic vector spaces, Cheng ultimately computes the trace of the Frobenius action on H by decomposing J[\ell] into Frq invariant symplectic subspaces. Overall, this paper offers a deep dive into connecting arithmetic path integrals with representations from quantum field theory and establishes intriguing parallels between mathematical structures and physical theories in function fields.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

Compare with the PDF

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.