LADDER: Self-Improving LLMs Through Recursive Problem Decomposition

Authors: Toby Simonds, Akira Yoshiyama

License: CC BY 4.0

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2503.00735v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
, , , , In their paper titled "LADDER: Self-Improving LLMs Through Recursive Problem Decomposition," authors Toby Simonds and Akira Yoshiyama introduce a groundbreaking framework called LADDER (Learning through Autonomous Difficulty-Driven Example Recursion). This framework empowers Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance their problem-solving abilities autonomously through self-guided learning. By iteratively generating and solving simpler versions of complex problems, LADDER enables models to progressively learn how to tackle more challenging tasks through reinforcement learning. The unique aspect of LADDER is its reliance on verifiable reward signals for guiding the model's self-improvement process, eliminating the need for curated datasets or human feedback. The model leverages its own capabilities to navigate through easier variants of sample questions, leading to significant advancements in problem-solving proficiency. The effectiveness of LADDER is demonstrated in mathematical integration tasks, where it substantially boosts the accuracy of a Llama 3B model from 1% to an impressive 82% on undergraduate-level problems. Additionally, a 7B parameter model achieves state-of-the-art performance (70%) on the prestigious MIT Integration Bee examination for its model size. Furthermore, the authors introduce Test-Time Reinforcement Learning (TTRL), a method that generates problem variants during inference and applies reinforcement learning to further enhance performance. By continuously creating and solving related problems during testing, TTRL enables the 7B model to achieve an outstanding score of 85%, surpassing previous benchmarks. Overall, these results highlight the potential of strategic self-directed learning in AI systems, showcasing how recursive problem decomposition and solution verification can lead to substantial capability improvements without relying on architectural scaling or human supervision. This innovative approach opens up new avenues for developing autonomous AI systems capable of extending their own capabilities in various domains.
AI-generated keywords: LADDER

AI-generated Key Points

  • Authors Toby Simonds and Akira Yoshiyama introduce the LADDER framework for Large Language Models (LLMs)
  • LADDER enables models to enhance problem-solving abilities autonomously through self-guided learning
  • The framework iteratively generates and solves simpler versions of complex problems, leading to reinforcement learning for tackling more challenging tasks
  • LADDER relies on verifiable reward signals for self-improvement, eliminating the need for curated datasets or human feedback
  • Effectiveness demonstrated in mathematical integration tasks with significant accuracy improvements in model performance
  • Introduction of Test-Time Reinforcement Learning (TTRL) method further enhances performance by generating problem variants during inference
  • TTRL enables models to achieve outstanding scores by continuously creating and solving related problems during testing
  • Strategic self-directed learning in AI systems showcases potential for substantial capability improvements without architectural scaling or human supervision
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: We introduce LADDER (Learning through Autonomous Difficulty-Driven Example Recursion), a framework enabling LLMs to autonomously improve their problem-solving capabilities through self-guided learning. By recursively generating and solving progressively simpler variants of complex problems, LADDER enables models to progressively learn through reinforcement learning how to solve harder problems. This self-improvement process is guided by verifiable reward signals, allowing the model to assess its solutions. Unlike prior approaches requiring curated datasets or human feedback, LADDER leverages the model's own capabilities to easier variants of sample questions. We demonstrate LADDER's effectiveness on mathematical integration tasks, where it improves a Llama 3B model's accuracy from 1\% to 82\% on undergraduate-level problems and enables a 7B parameter model to achieve state-of-the-art performance (70\%) on the MIT Integration Bee examination for it's model size. We also introduce TTRL (Test-Time Reinforcement Learning), a method that generates variants of test problems at inference time and applies reinforcement learning to further improve performance. By further creating and solving related problems during testing, TTRL enables the 7B model to achieve a score of 85\%, surpassing o1. These results showcase how strategic self-directed learning can achieve significant capability improvements without relying on architectural scaling or human supervision.

Submitted to arXiv on 02 Mar. 2025

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.