High-redshift LBG selection from broadband and wide photometric surveys using a Random Forest algorithm
Authors: C. Payerne, W. d'Assignies Doumerg, C. Yèche, V. Ruhlmann-Kleider, A. Raichoor, D. Lang, J. N. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, D. Bianchi, D. Brooks, T. Claybaugh, S. Cole, A. de la Macorra, B. Dey, P. Doel, A. Font-Ribera, J. E. Forero-Romero, S. Gontcho A Gontcho, G. Gutierrez, K. Honscheid, S. Juneau, A. Lambert, M. Landriau, L. Le Guillou, M. E. Levi, C. Magneville, M. Manera, A. Meisner, R. Miquel, J. Moustakas, J. A. Newman, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, W. Percival, F. Prada, I. Pérez-Ràfols, G. Rossi, E. Sanchez, D. Schlegel, M. Schubnell, D. Sprayberry, G. Tarlé, B. A. Weaver, H. Zou
AI-generated Key Points
- Authors explore selection of high-redshift Lyman-Break Galaxies (LBG) using current and upcoming broadband wide photometric surveys
- Random Forest algorithm used to identify LBGs in surveys like UNIONS or Vera C. Rubin LSST
- Research conducted within framework of future large-scale structure spectroscopic surveys such as DESI-II
- Deep imaging data from HSC and CLAUDS on COSMOS and XMM-LSS fields leveraged for analysis
- Methodology yields LBG density of 873 deg$^{-2}$ for targets with redshifts greater than 2 post-spectroscopic validation with DESI
- Secure spectroscopic sample generated with average redshift of 3 for DESI-II forecasts
- Precise measurements of Alcock-Paczynski parameters $\alpha_\perp$ and $\alpha_{\parallel}$ at levels of 0.7% and 1%, respectively, within redshift range of $2.6 < z < 3.2$
- Prediction of dark energy fraction measurement at 2% precision
- Estimate uncertainty in local non-Gaussianity with predicted value close to $\sigma_{f_{\rm NL}} \approx 7$, comparable to best precision achieved by Planck
Abstract: In this paper, we investigate the possibility of selecting high-redshift Lyman-Break Galaxies (LBG) using current and future broadband wide photometric surveys, such as UNIONS or the Vera C. Rubin LSST, using a Random Forest algorithm. This work is conducted in the context of future large-scale structure spectroscopic surveys like DESI-II, the next phase of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), which will start around 2029. We use deep imaging data from HSC and CLAUDS on the COSMOS and XMM-LSS fields. To predict the selection performance of LBGs with image quality similar to UNIONS, we degrade the $u, g, r, i$ and $z$ bands to UNIONS depth. The Random Forest algorithm is trained with the $u,g,r,i$ and $z$ bands to classify LBGs in the $2.5 < z < 3.5$ range. We find that fixing a target density budget of $1,100$ deg$^{-2}$, the Random Forest approach gives a density of $z>2$ targets of $873$ deg$^{-2}$, and a density of $493$ deg$^{-2}$ of confirmed LBGs after spectroscopic confirmation with DESI. This UNIONS-like selection was tested in a dedicated spectroscopic observation campaign of 1,000 targets with DESI on the COSMOS field, providing a safe spectroscopic sample with a mean redshift of 3. This sample is used to derive forecasts for DESI-II, assuming a sky coverage of 5,000 deg$^2$. We predict uncertainties on Alcock-Paczynski parameters $\alpha_\perp$ and $\alpha_{\parallel}$ to be 0.7$\%$ and 1$\%$ for $2.6<z<3.2$, resulting in a 2$\%$ measurement of the dark energy fraction. Additionally, we estimate the uncertainty in local non-Gaussianity and predict $\sigma_{f_{\rm NL}}\approx 7$, which is comparable to the current best precision achieved by Planck.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
We compare the title and abstract with papers indexed in our database. For arXiv papers, we search within the same category; for DOI and other sources, we search across sources and subjects. You can rerun the search as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.