AI summary · arXiv: 2406.07315v1 · cs.IR

Fetch-A-Set: A Large-Scale OCR-Free Benchmark for Historical Document Retrieval

Adrià Molina, Oriol Ramos Terrades, Josep Lladós

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 11 Jun. 2024 Preprint for the manuscript accepted for publication in the DAS2024 LNCS proceedings License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

The essentials

  • Increasing automation in document understanding procedures across industries
  • Digitization of historical documents in archives and libraries
  • Introduction of Fetch-A-Set (FAS) benchmark for legislative historical document analysis systems
  • Focus on text-to-image retrieval and image-to-text topic extraction
  • Addressing challenges of large-scale document retrieval in historical contexts
  • Providing baselines and data for development and evaluation of robust historical document retrieval systems

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Automation

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
, , , , In the era of increasing automation in document understanding procedures, there is a growing need for systems that can extract information, index, summarize, and assist in decision-making tasks across various industries. This trend extends to the digitization of historical documents in archives and libraries, where the automation of document management processes is becoming more prevalent. With historical data gaining importance in governmental bodies, heritage management is also undergoing a shift towards automation. The paper introduces Fetch-A-Set (FAS), a comprehensive benchmark tailored specifically for legislative historical document analysis systems. FAS addresses the challenges of large-scale document retrieval in historical contexts by providing a vast repository of documents dating back to the XVII century. This repository serves as both a training resource and an evaluation benchmark for retrieval systems, filling a critical gap in the literature by focusing on complex extractive tasks within the domain of cultural heritage. One key aspect of FAS is its focus on text-to-image retrieval for queries and image-to-text topic extraction from document fragments while accommodating varying levels of document legibility. The benchmark aims to spur advancements in the field by providing baselines and data for the development and evaluation of robust historical document retrieval systems, particularly in scenarios characterized by a wide historical spectrum. The paper delves into two main challenges faced by heritage institutions when handling vast sources of historical documents. Firstly, it addresses the need for continuous indexing of databases to enable natural language queries through a "text-to-image" task known as topic spotting. Secondly, it explores the "image-to-text" task of information extraction to provide feasible sets of texts from images automatically categorizing historical data in archival procedures. By incorporating complex understanding tasks into historical document analysis systems, novel services are expected to emerge that will enhance our understanding of history. The proposed benchmark aims to evaluate the effectiveness of document understanding systems in fetching relevant information directly from natural text without relying on expensive OCR solutions, especially for large historical collections with significant temporal variance. Overall, this work contributes significantly to advancing research in historical document analysis by addressing key challenges associated with topic-aware document retrieval and providing valuable insights into improving system performance in this domain.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.