AI summary · arXiv: 2404.14551v1 · hep-th

Learning S-Matrix Phases with Neural Operators

V. Niarchos, C. Papageorgakis

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 22 Apr. 2024 36 pages, 8 figures License: CC BY 4.0

The essentials

  • Investigating relationship between modulus and phase of scattering amplitudes in elastic 2 → 2 scattering at fixed energies
  • Using Fourier Neural Operators (FNOs) to learn relationship from data on amplitudes with finite partial wave expansions
  • FNOs accurately predict phases even with infinite partial wave expansions, providing a classification index for prediction quality
  • Strong correlation between classification index and violation of unitarity constraints for predicted phases
  • Unconventional application of FNOs involves regression-classification task, emphasizing importance of statistics in ensembles of Neural Operators (NOs)
  • Potential of FNOs as new methodology for studying complex function mappings in Theoretical Physics
  • Contribution to advancing understanding of function relationships in theoretical frameworks and bridging gaps between explicit solutions and elusive structures using data-driven techniques like Machine Learning

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: S-matrix theory

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
, , , , In this study, we investigate the relationship between the modulus and phase of scattering amplitudes in elastic 2 → 2 scattering at fixed energies. This connection is crucial in S-matrix theory and is typically governed by unitarity constraints through a complex integral equation. However, instead of directly solving this equation, we employ a novel approach using Fourier Neural Operators (FNOs) to learn and uncover this relationship from data on amplitudes with finite partial wave expansions. Our methodology involves training FNOs on a dataset comprising both true and false samples of amplitudes, aiming to accurately predict the phases even when dealing with infinite partial wave expansions. Remarkably, our results show that the FNOs not only predict these phases but also provide a classification index indicating the quality of their predictions. We observe a strong correlation between this index and the violation of unitarity constraints for the predicted phases, highlighting the efficacy of our approach in distinguishing between allowed and disallowed profiles of the modulus. This unconventional application of FNOs presents a unique challenge as it involves a simultaneous regression-classification task, emphasizing the importance of statistics in ensembles of Neural Operators (NOs). Our findings shed light on both the merits and limitations of using FNOs in Theoretical Physics, showcasing its potential as a new methodology for studying complex function mappings in various contexts. Furthermore, we contextualize our research within the broader landscape of Physics and Mathematics where understanding maps between functions is paramount. Particularly in non-perturbative Quantum Field Theories (QFTs), where traditional methods often fall short, novel approaches like ours hold promise for uncovering hidden structures and generalizing towards computationally challenging scenarios. By leveraging data-driven techniques like Machine Learning, we aim to bridge gaps between explicit solutions in special cases and elusive structures in generic regimes. Overall, our study contributes to advancing our understanding of function relationships in theoretical frameworks while paving the way for innovative methodologies that combine data-driven insights with analytical approaches. Through our exploration of scattering amplitudes using FNOs, we demonstrate how modern techniques can offer new perspectives on longstanding problems in Physics and Mathematics.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Slides to present it
For journalists Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.