AI summary · arXiv: 2310.04367v2 · stat.ML

A Marketplace Price Anomaly Detection System at Scale

Akshit Sarpal, Qiwen Kang, Fangping Huang, Yang Song, Lijie Wan

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 06 Oct. 2023 10 pages, 4 figures, 7 tables License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

The essentials

  • Authors address challenges faced by online marketplaces in managing a large volume of price updates initiated by individual sellers
  • Democratization of pricing on platforms leads to an increase in data quality issues
  • Lack of centralized guardrails can result in inaccurate prices being published, impacting customer experience and posing a risk of revenue loss
  • Introduction of MoatPlus, a scalable price anomaly detection framework for growing marketplace platforms
  • Objective of MoatPlus is to leverage proximity and historical price trends to establish an upper price bound using unsupervised statistical features
  • Framework employs ensemble models to detect irregularities, exclude problematic elements, and utilize optimized weighting scheme for reliable price boundary within real-time pricing pipeline
  • Significant improvements observed in precise anchor coverage, especially in high-vulnerability item subsets
  • Innovative approach enhances accuracy and reliability of pricing while mitigating risks associated with erroneous pricing strategies
  • Implementation of MoatPlus offers promising solution for marketplace operators to maintain data integrity and optimize pricing strategies at scale

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Marketplace Price Anomaly Detection Online Retail Data Quality MoatPlus

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
In their paper titled "A Marketplace Price Anomaly Detection System at Scale," authors Akshit Sarpal, Qiwen Kang, Fangping Huang, Yang Song, and Lijie Wan address the challenges faced by online marketplaces in managing a large volume of price updates initiated by individual sellers. The democratization of pricing on these platforms has led to an increase in data quality issues. The lack of centralized guardrails present in traditional online retail settings can result in inaccurate prices being published. This not only impacts customer experience but also poses a risk of revenue loss for marketplace operators. To tackle this issue, the authors introduce MoatPlus, a scalable price anomaly detection framework designed specifically for growing marketplace platforms. The key objective of MoatPlus is to leverage proximity and historical price trends derived from unsupervised statistical features to establish an upper price bound. By employing an ensemble of models, the framework is able to detect irregularities in price-based features, exclude problematic elements, and utilize an optimized weighting scheme to construct a reliable price boundary within the real-time pricing pipeline. Through their research, the authors observed significant improvements in precise anchor coverage, particularly in high-vulnerability item subsets. This innovative approach not only enhances the accuracy and reliability of pricing on online marketplaces but also contributes towards mitigating potential risks associated with erroneous pricing strategies. Overall, the implementation of MoatPlus offers a promising solution for marketplace operators seeking to maintain data integrity and optimize pricing strategies at scale.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.