Towards Ontology Construction with Language Models

Authors: Maurice Funk, Simon Hosemann, Jean Christoph Jung, Carsten Lutz

KBC-LM'23: Knowledge Base Construction from Pre-trained Language Models workshop at ISWC 2023
License: CC BY 4.0

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2309.09898v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
In their paper titled "Towards Ontology Construction with Language Models," Maurice Funk, Simon Hosemann, Jean Christoph Jung, and Carsten Lutz present a method for automatically constructing a concept hierarchy for a given domain by querying a large language model (LLM). They specifically focus on utilizing OpenAI's GPT 3.5 for this purpose. The authors conducted experiments in various domains and found that LLMs can significantly aid in the construction of concept hierarchies. The existing methods for ontology construction assume that the schema of the ontology is predetermined and provided as input. However, when working with LLMs, this approach may not be ideal as designing a schema for an entire domain is complex and requires domain expertise. Additionally, the process of designing a schema and creating a concept hierarchy are closely intertwined. LLMs have the capability to generate keywords and phrases based on user-provided context, making them valuable tools for proposing concept and property names in a given domain. To simplify the ontological representation in this initial paper, the authors focus solely on constructing a concept hierarchy by considering only the subconcept/is-a relation without incorporating other relations. Their algorithm begins with a seed concept (e.g., Animals) to define the domain, and all concepts in the generated hierarchy are subconcepts of this seed concept. By leveraging LLMs which provide powerful contextual suggestions, ontology construction becomes more efficient and less reliant on predefined schemas. The authors acknowledge that as the expressiveness of ontology languages increases, more design decisions will need to be made during construction. However, their current approach lays the foundation for future work in developing more comprehensive ontologies using LLMs. Overall, this paper highlights how language models can be effectively utilized to automate concept hierarchy construction within specific domains offering significant potential benefits in various knowledge-based applications.
AI-generated keywords: Ontology Construction

AI-generated Key Points

  • Method for automatically constructing a concept hierarchy using a large language model (LLM)
  • Focus on utilizing OpenAI's GPT 3.5 for concept hierarchy construction
  • LLMs significantly aid in the construction of concept hierarchies
  • Existing methods assume predetermined ontology schema, which may not be ideal when working with LLMs
  • LLMs can generate keywords and phrases for proposing concept and property names
  • Initial focus on constructing a concept hierarchy based on subconcept/is-a relation only
  • Algorithm starts with a seed concept to define the domain, all concepts are subconcepts of this seed concept
  • LLMs make ontology construction more efficient and less reliant on predefined schemas
  • More design decisions will be needed as ontology languages become more expressive
  • Current approach lays foundation for future work in developing comprehensive ontologies using LLMs
  • Language models automate concept hierarchy construction in specific domains with potential benefits in knowledge-based applications.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: We present a method for automatically constructing a concept hierarchy for a given domain by querying a large language model. We apply this method to various domains using OpenAI's GPT 3.5. Our experiments indicate that LLMs can be of considerable help for constructing concept hierarchies.

Submitted to arXiv on 18 Sep. 2023

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 1

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.