The formation pathways of compact elliptical galaxies

Authors: Simon Deeley, Michael Drinkwater, Sarah Sweet, Kenji Bekki, Warrick Couch, Duncan Forbes

arXiv: 2308.00305v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
18 pages, 15 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2308.00305v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
Compact elliptical (cE) galaxies have long been a challenging class of galaxies to study. Recent observations have indicated that isolated cEs and host-associated cEs follow different formation pathways, and simulations have also suggested multiple pathways for the formation of cE galaxies. However, a definitive link between these pathways has not yet been established, and the relative contributions of each pathway in a cosmological context remain unknown. To address this gap in knowledge, the authors of this study combined data from the SAMI galaxy survey with a matched sample of galaxies from the IllustrisTNG cosmological simulation. By analyzing a spatially-resolved observational sample of cEs, they aimed to gain insights into how these galaxies form. The results revealed distinct differences between isolated and host-associated cEs. The observed cEs located near a host galaxy appeared redder, smaller, and older compared to isolated cEs. This finding supports previous evidence suggesting that there are multiple formation pathways for cE galaxies. Tracing the simulated cEs back through time, the researchers identified two main formation pathways. Approximately 32 ± 5 percent of cEs formed through the stripping of a spiral galaxy by a larger host galaxy, while 68 ± 4 percent formed through a gradual build-up of stellar mass in isolated environments. Importantly, this study confirms that cEs in different environments do indeed form via different pathways. All isolated cEs in the sample were found to have formed via in-situ formation (i.e., none were ejected from a previous host), while 77 ± 6 percent of host-associated cEs formed through tidal stripping. By separating the cEs based on their formation pathway, the researchers were able to reproduce the observed differences between isolated and host-associated cEs. This suggests that these differences can be fully explained by the dominance of different formation pathways in each environment. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into understanding how compact elliptical galaxies form by combining observational data with simulations to shed light on their complex processes involved in their creation.
AI-generated keywords: Compact elliptical galaxies

AI-generated Key Points

  • Compact elliptical (cE) galaxies are challenging to study
  • Isolated cEs and host-associated cEs have different formation pathways
  • Link between these pathways not established, contributions in cosmological context unknown
  • Study combines data from SAMI galaxy survey and IllustrisTNG cosmological simulation
  • Spatially-resolved observational sample of cEs analyzed to understand their formation
  • Observed differences between isolated and host-associated cEs: redder, smaller, older for those near a host galaxy
  • Two main formation pathways identified: stripping of a spiral galaxy by larger host (32%), gradual build-up of stellar mass in isolated environments (68%)
  • All isolated cEs formed via in-situ formation, 77% of host-associated cEs formed through tidal stripping
  • Differences between isolated and host-associated cEs can be explained by dominance of different formation pathways in each environment
  • Study provides insights into complex processes involved in the creation of compact elliptical galaxies.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: Compact elliptical (cE) galaxies remain an elusively difficult galaxy class to study. Recent observations have suggested that isolated and host-associated cEs have different formation pathways, while simulation studies have also shown different pathways can lead to a cE galaxy. However a solid link has not been established, and the relative contributions of each pathway in a cosmological context remains unknown. Here we combine a spatially-resolved observational sample of cEs taken from the SAMI galaxy survey with a matched sample of galaxies within the IllustrisTNG cosmological simulation to establish an overall picture of how these galaxies form. The observed cEs located near a host galaxy appear redder, smaller and older than isolated cEs, supporting previous evidence for multiple formation pathways. Tracing the simulated cEs back through time, we find two main formation pathways; 32 $\pm$ 5 percent formed via the stripping of a spiral galaxy by a larger host galaxy, while 68 $\pm$ 4 percent formed through a gradual build-up of stellar mass in isolated environments. We confirm that cEs in different environments do indeed form via different pathways, with all isolated cEs in our sample having formed via in-situ formation (i.e. none were ejected from a previous host), and 77 $\pm$ 6 percent of host-associated cEs having formed via tidal stripping. Separating them by their formation pathway, we are able to reproduce the observed differences between isolated and host-associated cEs, showing that these differences can be fully explained by the different formation pathways dominating in each environment.

Submitted to arXiv on 01 Aug. 2023

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.