Predicting Perfect Quality Segments in MT Output with Fine-Tuned OpenAI LLM: Is it possible to capture editing distance patterns from historical data?

Authors: Serge Gladkoff, Gleb Erofeev, Lifeng Han, Goran Nenadic

6 pages, 5 figures, under-review to ItalianNLP-2023
License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2308.00158v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
This study investigates the potential of fine-tuning large language models (LLMs), specifically ChatGPT, for the task of Translation Quality Estimation (TQE). TQE is a crucial step in assessing the quality of machine translation (MT) and human translation (HT) without relying on reference translations. The researchers approach TQE as a binary classification task and use English-Italian and English-German training data to experiment with fine-tuned ChatGPT via its API. The results show that ChatGPT achieves a relatively high score in predicting translation quality, indicating whether a translation needs editing. However, there is still room for improvement in accuracy. The authors provide an overview of their methodology, which involves collecting historical post-editing data from past projects on ERP content translation in multiple languages. They then use OpenAI's API access to fine-tune the ChatGPT model for the classification task. Overall, this work contributes to understanding how LLMs can be utilized for TQE and highlights areas for further enhancement in predicting perfect quality segments in MT output.
AI-generated keywords: Translation Quality Estimation

AI-generated Key Points

  • Study investigates potential of fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) for Translation Quality Estimation (TQE)
  • TQE is crucial for assessing quality of machine translation (MT) and human translation (HT)
  • Approach TQE as a binary classification task using English-Italian and English-German training data
  • Fine-tuned ChatGPT achieves relatively high score in predicting translation quality, but room for improvement in accuracy
  • Methodology involves collecting historical post-editing data and using OpenAI's API access to fine-tune ChatGPT model
  • Contributes to understanding how LLMs can be utilized for TQE and highlights areas for further enhancement in predicting perfect quality segments in MT output
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: Translation Quality Estimation (TQE) is an important step before deploying the output translation into usage. TQE is also critical in assessing machine translation (MT) and human translation (HT) quality without seeing the reference translations. In this work, we examine if the state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) can be fine-tuned for the TQE task and their capability. We take ChatGPT as one example and approach TQE as a binary classification task. Using English-Italian and English-German training corpus, our experimental results show that fine-tuned ChatGPT via its API can achieve a relatively high score on predicting translation quality, i.e. if the translation needs to be edited, but there is definitely space to improve the accuracy. English-Italiano bilingual Abstract is available in the paper.

Submitted to arXiv on 31 Jul. 2023

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.