C3: Zero-shot Text-to-SQL with ChatGPT

Authors: Xuemei Dong, Chao Zhang, Yuhang Ge, Yuren Mao, Yunjun Gao, lu Chen, Jinshu Lin, Dongfang Lou

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2307.07306v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
This paper presents C3, a novel ChatGPT-based zero-shot Text-to-SQL method that achieves state-of-the-art performance on the Spider Challenge. The proposed method achieves an execution accuracy of 82.3% on the holdout test set of Spider. C3 consists of three key components: Clear Prompting (CP), Calibration with Hints (CH), and Consistent Output (CO). CP focuses on improving the model's input by providing clear prompts to guide the generation process. CH addresses the issue of model bias by calibrating the model's output using hints. CO ensures consistent and coherent output by leveraging a consistency loss during training. The effectiveness and efficiency of C3 are extensively evaluated through experiments, which demonstrate that it outperforms existing methods in terms of execution accuracy, making it the new state-of-the-art zero-shot Text-to-SQL method for the Spider Challenge. The systematic treatment provided by C3 offers a promising approach for addressing zero-shot Text-to-SQL tasks. The authors of this paper are Xuemei Dong, Chao Zhang, Yuhang Ge, Yuren Mao, Yunjun Gao, lu Chen, Jinshu Lin, and Dongfang Lou.
AI-generated keywords: C3 Text-to-SQL Spider Challenge Clear Prompting Calibration with Hints

AI-generated Key Points

  • C3 is a novel ChatGPT-based zero-shot Text-to-SQL method
  • Achieves state-of-the-art performance on the Spider Challenge
  • Execution accuracy of 82.3% on the holdout test set of Spider
  • C3 consists of three key components: Clear Prompting (CP), Calibration with Hints (CH), and Consistent Output (CO)
  • CP improves model's input by providing clear prompts
  • CH calibrates model's output using hints to address model bias
  • CO ensures consistent and coherent output through consistency loss during training
  • Outperforms existing methods in terms of execution accuracy
  • Promising approach for addressing zero-shot Text-to-SQL tasks
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: This paper proposes a ChatGPT-based zero-shot Text-to-SQL method, dubbed C3, which achieves 82.3\% in terms of execution accuracy on the holdout test set of Spider and becomes the state-of-the-art zero-shot Text-to-SQL method on the Spider Challenge. C3 consists of three key components: Clear Prompting (CP), Calibration with Hints (CH), and Consistent Output (CO), which are corresponding to the model input, model bias and model output respectively. It provides a systematic treatment for zero-shot Text-to-SQL. Extensive experiments have been conducted to verify the effectiveness and efficiency of our proposed method.

Submitted to arXiv on 14 Jul. 2023

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.