ChatGraph: Interpretable Text Classification by Converting ChatGPT Knowledge to Graphs
Authors: Yucheng Shi, Hehuan Ma, Wenliang Zhong, Gengchen Mai, Xiang Li, Tianming Liu, Junzhou Huang
AI-generated Key Points
- The paper addresses limitations of ChatGPT, a large language model (LLM)
- Limitations include inflexibility of finetuning on downstream tasks and lack of interpretability in decision-making process
- Authors propose a framework that utilizes ChatGPT for text classification tasks while enhancing interpretability
- Framework involves extracting refined and structural knowledge from raw data using ChatGPT through knowledge graph extraction task
- Rich knowledge is converted into a graph, which is used to train an interpretable linear classifier for predictions
- Method shows significant improvements in performance compared to directly utilizing ChatGPT for text classification tasks
- Approach offers a more transparent decision-making process compared to previous methods
- Paper authored by Yucheng Shi, Hehuan Ma, Wenliang Zhong, Gengchen Mai, Xiang Li, Tianming Liu and Junzhou Huang in the field of computer science with primary categories including cs.CL (Computation and Language), cs.AI (Artificial Intelligence) and cs.LG (Machine Learning)
Abstract: ChatGPT, as a recently launched large language model (LLM), has shown superior performance in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks. However, two major limitations hinder its potential applications: (1) the inflexibility of finetuning on downstream tasks and (2) the lack of interpretability in the decision-making process. To tackle these limitations, we propose a novel framework that leverages the power of ChatGPT for specific tasks, such as text classification, while improving its interpretability. The proposed framework conducts a knowledge graph extraction task to extract refined and structural knowledge from the raw data using ChatGPT. The rich knowledge is then converted into a graph, which is further used to train an interpretable linear classifier to make predictions. To evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed method, we conduct experiments on four datasets. The result shows that our method can significantly improve the performance compared to directly utilizing ChatGPT for text classification tasks. And our method provides a more transparent decision-making process compared with previous text classification methods.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
We compare the title and abstract with papers indexed in our database. For arXiv papers, we search within the same category; for DOI and other sources, we search across sources and subjects. You can rerun the search as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.