AI summary · arXiv: 2305.02336v4 · cond-mat.str-el

Theory of shot noise in strange metals

Alexander Nikolaenko, Subir Sachdev, Aavishkar A. Patel

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 03 May. 2023 Physical Review Research 5, 043143 (2023) 30 pages, 3 figures License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

  • Theory of shot noise in strange metals
  • Extension of the Boltzmann equation with a noise source
  • Distribution functions dependent on excitation momentum and energy
  • Application to a model of a strange metal with linear resistivity in temperature ($T$)
  • Suppression of Fano factor in strange metals compared to diffusive metals with quasiparticles
  • Fano factor equal to $1/6$ at low temperatures, contrasting with $1/3$ in diffusive metals
  • Dependence of shot noise on temperature and applied voltage in the strange metal model
  • Consistency with recent observations by Chen et al. (arXiv:2206.00673)
  • Comparison between random Yukawa model and quasi-elastic electron-phonon scattering for linear resistivity in $T$
  • Shot noise as a diagnostic tool for distinguishing between mechanisms contributing to linear resistivity

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Shot noise Strange metals Fano factor Linear resistivity Electron-phonon scattering

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
In their paper titled "Theory of shot noise in strange metals," Alexander Nikolaenko, Subir Sachdev, and Aavishkar A. Patel extend the theory of shot noise to strange metals that lack quasiparticle excitations. This extension requires a generalization of the Boltzmann equation with a noise source to distribution functions that independently depend on both excitation momentum and energy. The authors apply this theory to a model of a strange metal with linear resistivity in temperature ($T$). The model describes a Fermi surface with a spatially random Yukawa coupling to a critical boson. They find that the Fano factor, which characterizes the suppression or enhancement of shot noise relative to Poisson statistics, is suppressed in the strange metal compared to diffusive metals with quasiparticles. At low temperatures, they obtain a Fano factor equal to $1/6$, contrasting with the $1/3$ Fano factor observed in diffusive metals. The study also explores the dependence of shot noise on temperature and applied voltage in the strange metal model. The authors note that their results are generally consistent with recent observations by Chen et al. (arXiv:2206.00673). Furthermore, they compare their random Yukawa model to quasi-elastic electron-phonon scattering, which also generates linear resistivity in temperature ($T$). They argue that shot noise observations can serve as a useful diagnostic tool for distinguishing between these two mechanisms. Overall, this paper presents an extended theory of shot noise in strange metals without quasiparticle excitations and applies it to a specific model describing a Fermi surface coupled to critical bosons. The findings highlight the suppression of the Fano factor in strange metals and provide insights into how shot noise depends on temperature and applied voltage. Additionally, the study suggests that shot noise measurements can help differentiate between different mechanisms contributing to linear resistivity in temperature.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.