AI summary · arXiv: 2303.10130v2 · econ.GN

GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models

Tyna Eloundou, Sam Manning, Pamela Mishkin, Daniel Rock

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 17 Mar. 2023 License: CC BY-SA 4.0

The essentials

  • A recent study investigated the potential implications of Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) models and related technologies on the U.S. labor market.
  • The study proposed a new rubric for understanding Language Model Models (LLMs) capabilities and their potential effects on jobs.
  • Approximately 80% of the U.S. workforce could have at least 10% of their work tasks affected by the introduction of GPTs, while around 19% may see at least 50% of their tasks impacted.
  • The impact spans all wage levels, with higher-income jobs potentially facing greater exposure.
  • Information processing industries have high exposure rates compared to other industries indicating that GPTs are general-purpose technologies with far-reaching impacts beyond specific sectors or industries.
  • Access to image capabilities is categorized separately to facilitate annotation though they are combined for all analyses in order to ensure quality annotations were obtained both human ratings and GPT-4 ratings were collected using a similar rubric applied to O*NET Detailed Worker Activity (DWA) and task data pairs respectively.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: GPT LLM O*NET Exposure Annotation

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
The potential implications of Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) models and related technologies on the U.S. labor market have been investigated in a recent study. The study focuses not only on the progress of these models but also on the breadth, scale, and capabilities of complementary technologies developed around them. To contextualize this progression and complement labor impact forecasts of technology, a new rubric for understanding Language Model Models (LLMs) capabilities and their potential effects on jobs has been proposed. This rubric measures the overall exposure of tasks to GPTs by using human annotators and GPT-4 itself as classifiers to apply it to occupational data primarily sourced from the O*NET database. Approximately 80% of the U.S. workforce could have at least 10% of their work tasks affected by the introduction of GPTs, while around 19% may see at least 50% of their tasks impacted. The influence spans all wage levels, with higher-income jobs potentially facing greater exposure. Notably, the impact is not limited to industries with higher recent productivity growth. Exposure analysis by industry shows information processing industries having high exposure rates compared to other industries indicating that GPTs are indeed general-purpose technologies with far-reaching impacts beyond specific sectors or industries. The study concludes that Generative Pre-trained Transformers exhibit characteristics of general-purpose technologies (GPTs), suggesting that as these models could have notable economic, social, and policy implications. In practice, access to image capabilities is categorized separately to facilitate annotation though they are combined for all analyses in order to ensure quality annotations were obtained both human ratings and GPT-4 ratings were collected using a similar rubric applied to O*NET Detailed Worker Activity (DWA) and task data pairs respectively.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

Compare with the PDF

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.