Large Language Models for Code: Security Hardening and Adversarial Testing

Authors: Jingxuan He, Martin Vechev

License: CC BY 4.0

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2302.05319v3

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
Large language models (LMs) are increasingly being trained on massive codebases and used to generate code. However, these LMs lack awareness of security and often produce unsafe code. In this work, the authors focus on studying the security of LMs in two important aspects: security hardening and adversarial testing. To address these issues, the authors propose a new security task called controlled code generation. This task takes a binary property as input to guide the LM in generating either secure or unsafe code while still maintaining its ability to generate functionally correct code. They introduce a novel learning-based approach called SVEN to solve this task. SVEN leverages property-specific continuous vectors to guide program generation towards the desired property without modifying the weights of the LM. The training procedure optimizes these continuous vectors by enforcing specialized loss terms on different regions of code using a carefully curated high-quality dataset. The evaluation of SVEN shows that it is highly effective in achieving strong security control. For example, when applied to a state-of-the-art CodeGen LM with 2.7B parameters, SVEN increases the generation of secure code from 59.1% to 92.3% during security hardening and decreases it to 36.8% during adversarial testing. Importantly, SVEN maintains functional correctness similar to the original LMs. In summary, this work addresses the security concerns associated with large LMs used for generating code by introducing a new task called controlled code generation and proposing an effective learning-based approach called SVEN. The results demonstrate that SVEN significantly improves the security control of LMs while preserving their functionality.
AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models

AI-generated Key Points

  • Large language models (LMs) lack security awareness and often produce unsafe code
  • Authors focus on studying LM security in two aspects: security hardening and adversarial testing
  • Proposed a new security task called controlled code generation
  • Introduced a learning-based approach called SVEN to solve the task
  • SVEN uses property-specific continuous vectors to guide program generation towards desired properties without modifying LM weights
  • Training procedure optimizes continuous vectors using specialized loss terms on different regions of code with high-quality dataset
  • Evaluation shows SVEN is highly effective in achieving strong security control
  • SVEN increases generation of secure code from 59.1% to 92.3% during security hardening and decreases it to 36.8% during adversarial testing for a CodeGen LM with 2.7B parameters
  • SVEN maintains functional correctness similar to original LMs
  • This work addresses security concerns of large LMs used for generating code by introducing controlled code generation task and proposing SVEN as an effective approach
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: Large language models (large LMs) are increasingly trained on massive codebases and used to generate code. However, LMs lack awareness of security and are found to frequently produce unsafe code. This work studies the security of LMs along two important axes: (i) security hardening, which aims to enhance LMs' reliability in generating secure code, and (ii) adversarial testing, which seeks to evaluate LMs' security at an adversarial standpoint. We address both of these by formulating a new security task called controlled code generation. The task is parametric and takes as input a binary property to guide the LM to generate secure or unsafe code, while preserving the LM's capability of generating functionally correct code. We propose a novel learning-based approach called SVEN to solve this task. SVEN leverages property-specific continuous vectors to guide program generation towards the given property, without modifying the LM's weights. Our training procedure optimizes these continuous vectors by enforcing specialized loss terms on different regions of code, using a high-quality dataset carefully curated by us. Our extensive evaluation shows that SVEN is highly effective in achieving strong security control. For instance, a state-of-the-art CodeGen LM with 2.7B parameters generates secure code for 59.1% of the time. When we employ SVEN to perform security hardening (or adversarial testing) on this LM, the ratio is significantly boosted to 92.3% (or degraded to 36.8%). Importantly, SVEN closely matches the original LMs in functional correctness.

Submitted to arXiv on 10 Feb. 2023

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.