Semantic Parsing for Conversational Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs
Authors: Laura Perez-Beltrachini, Parag Jain, Emilio Monti, Mirella Lapata
AI-generated Key Points
- The paper explores the development of semantic parsers that can understand natural language questions in a conversation with a user and translate them into formal queries over definitions in a general-purpose knowledge graph (KG) with vast vocabularies.
- The KG covers thousands of concept names and relations, as well as millions of entities.
- The authors develop a dataset where user questions are annotated with Sparql parses, and system answers correspond to execution results.
- The paper presents two different semantic parsing approaches and highlights the challenges involved in the task, including dealing with large vocabularies, modeling conversation context, predicting queries with multiple entities, and generalizing to new questions at test time.
- The authors hope that their dataset will serve as a useful testbed for the development of conversational semantic parsers.
- The authors release their dataset and models at https://github.com/EdinburghNLP/SPICE.
Abstract: In this paper, we are interested in developing semantic parsers which understand natural language questions embedded in a conversation with a user and ground them to formal queries over definitions in a general purpose knowledge graph (KG) with very large vocabularies (covering thousands of concept names and relations, and millions of entities). To this end, we develop a dataset where user questions are annotated with Sparql parses and system answers correspond to execution results thereof. We present two different semantic parsing approaches and highlight the challenges of the task: dealing with large vocabularies, modelling conversation context, predicting queries with multiple entities, and generalising to new questions at test time. We hope our dataset will serve as useful testbed for the development of conversational semantic parsers. Our dataset and models are released at https://github.com/EdinburghNLP/SPICE.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
We compare the title and abstract with papers indexed in our database. For arXiv papers, we search within the same category; for DOI and other sources, we search across sources and subjects. You can rerun the search as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.