Towards Modular Machine Learning Solution Development: Benefits and Trade-offs

Authors: Samiyuru Menik, Lakshmish Ramaswamy

License: CC BY 4.0

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2301.09753v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
In today's business landscape, machine learning technologies have demonstrated immense capabilities in various domains and play a key role in the success of modern businesses. However, the adoption of machine learning technologies has a lot of untapped potential due to the high cost of developing custom machine learning solutions that solve unique business problems. The monolithic nature prevalent in today's machine learning applications stands in the way of efficient and cost-effective customized solution development. To address this issue, this work explores the benefits of modular machine learning solutions and discusses how they can overcome some of the major solution engineering limitations of monolithic machine learning solutions. The authors analyze the trade-offs between modular and monolithic machine learning solutions through three deep learning problems; one text-based and two image-based. The experimental results show that modular machine learning solutions have promising potential to reap the solution engineering advantages of modularity while gaining performance and data advantages in a way that monolithic machine learning solutions do not permit. Modular solutions can reuse existing pre-trained models and exploit more data to achieve higher accuracy and overcome data limitations. Furthermore, black-box knowledge distillation is used to overcome performance challenges that modular solutions may face, showing its impact on accuracy and latency compared to original monolithic and modular solutions. The authors suggest further investigation into multi-stage modular machine learning solution development as an interesting avenue for addressing systems engineering concerns related to wider adoption of these technologies in diverse organizations. In conclusion, while acknowledging the immense potential and positive impact of current deep learning technologies, this work highlights the challenges and limitations of widespread monolithic deep learning technologies with respect to systems engineering concerns. It suggests semantic modularity in machine learning as an interesting avenue to address these issues by providing a more efficient and cost-effective approach for developing customized machine-learning-based solutions.
AI-generated keywords: Machine Learning Modular Solutions Monolithic Solutions Knowledge Distillation Customized Solutions

AI-generated Key Points

  • Machine learning technologies have demonstrated immense capabilities in various domains and play a key role in the success of modern businesses.
  • Adoption of machine learning technologies has untapped potential due to high cost of developing custom solutions that solve unique business problems.
  • Monolithic nature prevalent in today's machine learning applications stands in the way of efficient and cost-effective customized solution development.
  • Modular machine learning solutions can overcome some major solution engineering limitations of monolithic solutions.
  • Trade-offs between modular and monolithic machine learning solutions were analyzed through three deep learning problems; one text-based and two image-based.
  • Experimental results show that modular machine learning solutions have promising potential to reap the solution engineering advantages of modularity while gaining performance and data advantages in a way that monolithic machine learning solutions do not permit.
  • Modular solutions can reuse existing pre-trained models and exploit more data to achieve higher accuracy and overcome data limitations.
  • Black-box knowledge distillation is used to overcome performance challenges that modular solutions may face, showing its impact on accuracy and latency compared to original monolithic and modular solutions.
  • Further investigation into multi-stage modular machine learning solution development is suggested as an interesting avenue for addressing systems engineering concerns related to wider adoption of these technologies in diverse organizations.
  • Semantic modularity in machine learning is suggested as an interesting avenue to address issues by providing a more efficient and cost-effective approach for developing customized machine-learning-based solutions.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: Machine learning technologies have demonstrated immense capabilities in various domains. They play a key role in the success of modern businesses. However, adoption of machine learning technologies has a lot of untouched potential. Cost of developing custom machine learning solutions that solve unique business problems is a major inhibitor to far-reaching adoption of machine learning technologies. We recognize that the monolithic nature prevalent in today's machine learning applications stands in the way of efficient and cost effective customized machine learning solution development. In this work we explore the benefits of modular machine learning solutions and discuss how modular machine learning solutions can overcome some of the major solution engineering limitations of monolithic machine learning solutions. We analyze the trade-offs between modular and monolithic machine learning solutions through three deep learning problems; one text based and the two image based. Our experimental results show that modular machine learning solutions have a promising potential to reap the solution engineering advantages of modularity while gaining performance and data advantages in a way the monolithic machine learning solutions do not permit.

Submitted to arXiv on 23 Jan. 2023

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.