VindLU: A Recipe for Effective Video-and-Language Pretraining

Authors: Feng Cheng, Xizi Wang, Jie Lei, David Crandall, Mohit Bansal, Gedas Bertasius

Tech report
License: CC BY 4.0

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2212.05051v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
In recent years, there has been significant progress in video-and-language (VidL) understanding. This paper conducts an empirical study to demystify the most important factors in VidL model design. The study investigates various factors including spatiotemporal architecture design, multimodal fusion schemes, pretraining objectives, choice of pretraining data, pretraining and finetuning protocols, and dataset and model scaling. The results reveal that temporal modeling, video-to-text multimodal fusion, masked modeling objectives, and joint training on images and videos are critical for good performance on VidL tasks. Based on these insights, the authors develop a step-by-step recipe called VindLU for effective VidL pretraining. The final model trained using this recipe achieves comparable or better results than state-of-the-art approaches on several VidL tasks without relying on external CLIP pretraining. For example, on the text-to-video retrieval task their approach outperforms current state-of-the art by 7.8% on DiDeMo and 6.1% on ActivityNet. The paper also highlights the complexity of modern VidL frameworks by dissecting them along multiple dimensions such as temporal modeling schemes, multimodal fusion modules, pretraining objectives source of pretraining data and number of frames used for pretraining. It is noted that existing studies focused mainly on image based analysis or specific aspects of video modelling but did not cover a broad range of VidL design factors like this work does. Overall this work provides valuable empirical insights into VidL framework design choices and offers a practical recipe for effective VidL pre training . The findings contribute to advancing research in the VidL domain.
AI-generated keywords: VidL temporal modeling multimodal fusion pretraining objectives dataset scaling

AI-generated Key Points

  • Significant progress in video-and-language (VidL) understanding in recent years
  • Empirical study conducted to demystify important factors in VidL model design
  • Factors investigated include spatiotemporal architecture design, multimodal fusion schemes, pretraining objectives, choice of pretraining data, pretraining and finetuning protocols, and dataset and model scaling
  • Results reveal that temporal modeling, video-to-text multimodal fusion, masked modeling objectives, and joint training on images and videos are critical for good performance on VidL tasks
  • Step-by-step recipe called VindLU developed based on insights for effective VidL pretraining
  • VindLU achieves comparable or better results than state-of-the-art approaches on several VidL tasks without relying on external CLIP pretraining
  • Approach outperforms current state-of-the-art by 7.8% on DiDeMo and 6.1% on ActivityNet for text-to-video retrieval task
  • Complexity of modern VidL frameworks highlighted by dissecting them along multiple dimensions such as temporal modeling schemes, multimodal fusion modules, pretraining objectives source of pretraining data, and number of frames used for pretraining
  • Existing studies focused mainly on image-based analysis or specific aspects of video modelling but did not cover a broad range of VidL design factors like this work does
  • Provides valuable empirical insights into VidL framework design choices and offers a practical recipe for effective VidL pretraining
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: The last several years have witnessed remarkable progress in video-and-language (VidL) understanding. However, most modern VidL approaches use complex and specialized model architectures and sophisticated pretraining protocols, making the reproducibility, analysis and comparisons of these frameworks difficult. Hence, instead of proposing yet another new VidL model, this paper conducts a thorough empirical study demystifying the most important factors in the VidL model design. Among the factors that we investigate are (i) the spatiotemporal architecture design, (ii) the multimodal fusion schemes, (iii) the pretraining objectives, (iv) the choice of pretraining data, (v) pretraining and finetuning protocols, and (vi) dataset and model scaling. Our empirical study reveals that the most important design factors include: temporal modeling, video-to-text multimodal fusion, masked modeling objectives, and joint training on images and videos. Using these empirical insights, we then develop a step-by-step recipe, dubbed VindLU, for effective VidL pretraining. Our final model trained using our recipe achieves comparable or better than state-of-the-art results on several VidL tasks without relying on external CLIP pretraining. In particular, on the text-to-video retrieval task, our approach obtains 61.2% on DiDeMo, and 55.0% on ActivityNet, outperforming current SOTA by 7.8% and 6.1% respectively. Furthermore, our model also obtains state-of-the-art video question-answering results on ActivityNet-QA, MSRVTT-QA, MSRVTT-MC and TVQA. Our code and pretrained models are publicly available at: https://github.com/klauscc/VindLU.

Submitted to arXiv on 09 Dec. 2022

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.