Context Generation Improves Open Domain Question Answering

Authors: Dan Su, Mostofa Patwary, Shrimai Prabhumoye, Peng Xu, Ryan Prenger, Mohammad Shoeybi, Pascale Fung, Anima Anandkumar, Bryan Catanzaro

8 pages; Accepted at EACL2023

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2210.06349v2

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The paper titled "Context Generation Improves Open Domain Question Answering" addresses the challenge of closed-book question answering (QA) by proposing a two-stage framework that effectively exploits stored knowledge in pretrained language models (LMs). The proposed approach utilizes a coarse-to-fine approach to extract relevant knowledge and provide answers, overcoming the limitations of previous methods. Experimental results on three QA benchmarks demonstrate significant improvement over previous closed-book QA methods, achieving an exact matching accuracy of 68.6%. This method also performs on par with open-book methods that utilize external knowledge sources, showcasing its potential for hybrid models. The paper was authored by Dan Su, Mostofa Patwary, Shrimai Prabhumoye, Peng Xu, Ryan Prenger, Mohammad Shoeybi, Pascale Fung, Anima Anandkumar, and Bryan Catanzaro and has been accepted at EACL2023 conference.
AI-generated keywords: Context Generation

AI-generated Key Points

  • The paper proposes a two-stage framework for closed-book question answering (QA)
  • The approach utilizes pretrained language models (LMs) to exploit stored knowledge
  • A coarse-to-fine approach is used to extract relevant knowledge and provide answers
  • Experimental results show significant improvement over previous closed-book QA methods
  • Achieves an exact matching accuracy of 68.6% on three QA benchmarks
  • Performs on par with open-book methods that use external knowledge sources
  • Authored by Dan Su, Mostofa Patwary, Shrimai Prabhumoye, Peng Xu, Ryan Prenger, Mohammad Shoeybi, Pascale Fung, Anima Anandkumar, and Bryan Catanzaro
  • Accepted at EACL2023 conference
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: Closed-book question answering (QA) requires a model to directly answer an open-domain question without access to any external knowledge. Prior work on closed-book QA either directly finetunes or prompts a pretrained language model (LM) to leverage the stored knowledge. However, they do not fully exploit the parameterized knowledge. To address this issue, we propose a two-stage, closed-book QA framework which employs a coarse-to-fine approach to extract relevant knowledge and answer a question. Our approach first generates a related context for a given question by prompting a pretrained LM. We then prompt the same LM for answer prediction using the generated context and the question. Additionally, to eliminate failure caused by context uncertainty, we marginalize over generated contexts. Experimental results on three QA benchmarks show that our method significantly outperforms previous closed-book QA methods (e.g. exact matching 68.6% vs. 55.3%), and is on par with open-book methods that exploit external knowledge sources (e.g. 68.6% vs. 68.0%). Our method is able to better exploit the stored knowledge in pretrained LMs without adding extra learnable parameters or needing finetuning, and paves the way for hybrid models that integrate pretrained LMs with external knowledge.

Submitted to arXiv on 12 Oct. 2022

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.