Antibody Representation Learning for Drug Discovery

Authors: Lin Li, Esther Gupta, John Spaeth, Leslie Shing, Tristan Bepler, Rajmonda Sulo Caceres

arXiv: 2210.02881v1 - DOI (q-bio.QM)
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2210.02881v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The summary is not ready yet

Abstract: Therapeutic antibody development has become an increasingly popular approach for drug development. To date, antibody therapeutics are largely developed using large scale experimental screens of antibody libraries containing hundreds of millions of antibody sequences. The high cost and difficulty of developing therapeutic antibodies create a pressing need for computational methods to predict antibody properties and create bespoke designs. However, the relationship between antibody sequence and activity is a complex physical process and traditional iterative design approaches rely on large scale assays and random mutagenesis. Deep learning methods have emerged as a promising way to learn antibody property predictors, but predicting antibody properties and target-specific activities depends critically on the choice of antibody representations and data linking sequences to properties is often limited. Existing works have not yet investigated the value, limitations and opportunities of these methods in application to antibody-based drug discovery. In this paper, we present results on a novel SARS-CoV-2 antibody binding dataset and an additional benchmark dataset. We compare three classes of models: conventional statistical sequence models, supervised learning on each dataset independently, and fine-tuning an antibody specific pre-trained language model. Experimental results suggest that self-supervised pretraining of feature representation consistently offers significant improvement in over previous approaches. We also investigate the impact of data size on the model performance, and discuss challenges and opportunities that the machine learning community can address to advance in silico engineering and design of therapeutic antibodies.

Submitted to arXiv on 05 Oct. 2022

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.