Multimodal Contrastive Learning with LIMoE: the Language-Image Mixture of Experts

Authors: Basil Mustafa, Carlos Riquelme, Joan Puigcerver, Rodolphe Jenatton, Neil Houlsby

License: CC BY 4.0

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2206.02770v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
This paper introduces the Language-Image MoE (LIMoE), a sparse mixture of experts model capable of multimodal learning. While large sparsely-activated models have achieved excellent performance in various domains, they are typically trained on a single modality at a time. LIMoE accepts both images and text simultaneously and is trained using a contrastive loss. The model uses expert layers to learn an appropriate partitioning of modalities, but new challenges arise, such as training stability and balanced expert utilization, for which the authors propose an entropy-based regularization scheme. The paper presents remarkable performance improvements over dense models of equivalent computational cost across multiple scales. LIMoE-L/16 trained comparably to CLIP-L/14 achieves 78.6% zero-shot ImageNet accuracy (vs. 76.2%), and when further scaled to H/14 with additional data, it achieves 84.1%, comparable to state-of-the-art methods that use larger custom per-modality backbones and pre-training schemes. The authors also analyze the quantitative and qualitative behavior of LIMoE and demonstrate phenomena such as differing treatment of the modalities and the organic emergence of modality-specific experts. In related work, unimodal task-specific neural networks have been researched extensively, with increasing convergence towards Transformer-based architectures for both NLP and Computer Vision. Multimodal models aim to process multiple types of data using a single neural network. Many approaches fuse modalities or co-train on distinct tasks without aligning or fusing representations. The paper builds on deep Sparse Mixture of Experts models studied independently in Computer Vision and NLP contexts for transfer learning purposes. These models use a learned gating mechanism whereby only a subset of K experts out of E are activated for a given input Contrastive learning has been widely researched in self-supervised regimes but also in supervised regimes for aligned data from multiple modalities. However, the authors are not aware of previous research using a single model to process both images and texts for contrastive learning, neither with dense nor with sparse models. The paper concludes by discussing potential harms of large scale models, contrastive models, and web scale multimodal data. The authors propose that LIMoE is naturally a good candidate for efficient, large scale multimodal foundation models.
AI-generated keywords: Multimodal Learning

AI-generated Key Points

  • The Language-Image MoE (LIMoE) is a sparse mixture of experts model capable of multimodal learning.
  • LIMoE accepts both images and text simultaneously and is trained using a contrastive loss.
  • The model uses expert layers to learn an appropriate partitioning of modalities, but new challenges arise, such as training stability and balanced expert utilization, for which the authors propose an entropy-based regularization scheme.
  • LIMoE-L/16 trained comparably to CLIP-L/14 achieves 78.6% zero-shot ImageNet accuracy (vs. 76.2%), and when further scaled to H/14 with additional data, it achieves 84.1%, comparable to state-of-the-art methods that use larger custom per-modality backbones and pre-training schemes.
  • In related work, unimodal task-specific neural networks have been researched extensively, with increasing convergence towards Transformer-based architectures for both NLP and Computer Vision.
  • Multimodal models aim to process multiple types of data using a single neural network.
  • The paper builds on deep Sparse Mixture of Experts models studied independently in Computer Vision and NLP contexts for transfer learning purposes.
  • Contrastive learning has been widely researched in self-supervised regimes but also in supervised regimes for aligned data from multiple modalities.
  • The authors propose that LIMoE is naturally a good candidate for efficient, large scale multimodal foundation models.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: Large sparsely-activated models have obtained excellent performance in multiple domains. However, such models are typically trained on a single modality at a time. We present the Language-Image MoE, LIMoE, a sparse mixture of experts model capable of multimodal learning. LIMoE accepts both images and text simultaneously, while being trained using a contrastive loss. MoEs are a natural fit for a multimodal backbone, since expert layers can learn an appropriate partitioning of modalities. However, new challenges arise; in particular, training stability and balanced expert utilization, for which we propose an entropy-based regularization scheme. Across multiple scales, we demonstrate remarkable performance improvement over dense models of equivalent computational cost. LIMoE-L/16 trained comparably to CLIP-L/14 achieves 78.6% zero-shot ImageNet accuracy (vs. 76.2%), and when further scaled to H/14 (with additional data) it achieves 84.1%, comparable to state-of-the-art methods which use larger custom per-modality backbones and pre-training schemes. We analyse the quantitative and qualitative behavior of LIMoE, and demonstrate phenomena such as differing treatment of the modalities and the organic emergence of modality-specific experts.

Submitted to arXiv on 06 Jun. 2022

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.