Studying Buildings Outlines to Assess and Predict Energy Performance in Buildings: A Probabilistic Approach

Authors: Zohreh Shaghaghian, Fatemeh Shahsavari, Elham Delzendeh

11 pages, 6 figures, 5 tables
License: CC BY 4.0

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2111.08844v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The paper titled "Studying Buildings Outlines to Assess and Predict Energy Performance in Buildings: A Probabilistic Approach" explores the use of predictive models to inform architects and designers about the impact of their design decisions on energy consumption in buildings during early design stages. The authors highlight that building performance is typically calculated during the final phases of design when most specifications are fixed and unlikely to be modified based on design programs. Therefore, incorporating predictive models earlier in the design process can provide valuable insights. The study focuses on evaluating the impact of a building's outline on energy consumption using synthetic data. Four office outlines, including square, T, U, and L shapes, are selected for analysis. In addition to the shape parameter, other building features commonly used in literature such as Window to Wall Ratio (WWR), external wall material properties, glazing U value, windows' shading depth, and building orientation are considered. The results indicate that buildings with square shapes tend to be more energy-efficient compared to buildings with T, U, and L shapes of the same volume. Furthermore, T, U, and L shape samples exhibit similar behavior in terms of energy consumption. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is applied to assess the correlations between variables in the data distribution. The analysis reveals that wall material specifications explain approximately 40% of data variation. To predict a building's energy consumption based on its outline, polynomial regression models with different degrees of complexity are employed. The findings demonstrate that degree 2 polynomial models achieve a high accuracy level with over 98% R squared (coefficient of determination). This suggests that these models can effectively predict new samples. In conclusion, this paper emphasizes the importance of considering a building's outline in assessing and predicting its energy performance during early design stages. By utilizing synthetic data and applying probabilistic approaches along with advanced modeling techniques like polynomial regression and PCA analysis , architects and designers can make informed decisions regarding energy efficiency . These findings contribute to the development of sustainable building practices and can guide future design processes .
AI-generated keywords: Building Outlines Energy Performance Predictive Models Polynomial Regression PCA Analysis

AI-generated Key Points

  • The paper explores the use of predictive models to inform architects and designers about the impact of design decisions on energy consumption in buildings during early design stages.
  • Building performance is typically calculated during the final phases of design, so incorporating predictive models earlier can provide valuable insights.
  • The study focuses on evaluating the impact of a building's outline on energy consumption using synthetic data.
  • Buildings with square shapes tend to be more energy-efficient compared to T, U, and L shapes of the same volume.
  • Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is used to assess correlations between variables in the data distribution.
  • Wall material specifications explain approximately 40% of data variation.
  • Degree 2 polynomial regression models achieve high accuracy levels with over 98% R squared (coefficient of determination).
  • Considering a building's outline is important in assessing and predicting its energy performance during early design stages.
  • Synthetic data and probabilistic approaches, along with advanced modeling techniques like polynomial regression and PCA analysis, can help architects and designers make informed decisions regarding energy efficiency.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: Building performance is commonly calculated during the last phases of design, where most design specifications get fixed and are unlikely to be majorly modified based on design programs. Predictive models could play a significant role in informing architects and designers of the impact of their design decisions on energy consumption in buildings during early design stages. A building outline is a significant predictor of the final energy consumption and is conceptually determined by architects in the early design phases. This paper evaluates the impact of a building's outline on energy consumption using synthetic data to achieve appropriate predictive models in estimating a building's energy consumption. Four office outlines are selected in this study, including square, T, U, and L shapes. Besides the shape parameter, other building features commonly used in literature (i.e., Window to Wall Ratio (WWR), external wall material properties, glazing U value, windows' shading depth, and building orientation) are utilized in generating data distribution with a probabilistic approach. The results show that buildings with square shapes, in general, are more energy-efficient compared to buildings with T, U, and L shapes of the same volume. Also, T, U, and L shape samples show very similar behavior in terms of energy consumption. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is applied to assess the variables' correlations on data distribution; the results show that wall material specifications explain about 40% of data variation. Finally, we applied polynomial regression models with different degrees of complexity to predict the synthesized building models' energy consumptions based on their outlines. The results show that degree 2 polynomial models, fitting the data over 98% R squared (coefficient of determination), could be used to predict new samples with high accuracy.

Submitted to arXiv on 17 Nov. 2021

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.