AI summary · arXiv: 2109.14781v1 · q-bio.GN

Genomic prediction: progress and perspectives for rice improvement

Jérôme Bartholomé, Parthiban Thathapalli Prakash, Joshua N. Cobb

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 30 Sep. 2021 Book Chapter, 63 pages, 5 figures, 1 table License: CC BY-SA 4.0

The essentials

  • Genomic prediction is a powerful tool for achieving greater rates of genetic gain in quantitative traits.
  • There is strong interest in genomic prediction in rice, with numerous studies addressing various aspects of its use.
  • Accurate phenotyping is critical to successful implementation of genomic prediction, particularly for important traits such as grain yield.
  • High-throughput phenotyping methods have emerged as a potential solution to the bottleneck of accurate field phenotyping, but there are still constraints to routine use including acquisition of multi-environment field data and availability of data management systems that can handle large time-series datasets.
  • Better characterization of environmental factors affecting crop performance is necessary for successful implementation of genomic prediction.
  • Researchers should avoid overreliance on any single technology or approach without considering their limitations and benefits within specific contexts.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Genomic Prediction Rice Breeding Programs High-Throughput Phenotyping Genetic Gain

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
Genomic prediction has emerged as a powerful tool for achieving greater rates of genetic gain in quantitative traits, and its integration into breeding programs requires careful consideration. In rice (Oryza sativa), there is strong interest in genomic prediction, with numerous studies addressing various aspects of its use. This chapter reviews the literature on rice and provides important considerations for integrating genomic prediction into breeding programs. The authors use the irrigated breeding program at the International Rice Research Institute as a concrete example to highlight practical challenges associated with using predictions. Data and R scripts are provided to reproduce the analysis and emphasize that applying genomic prediction is not always the best approach nor the first step to increasing the rate of genetic gain in every context. Accurate phenotyping is one critical aspect of successful implementation of genomic prediction. While genomics can reduce some phenotyping steps, accurate field phenotyping for important traits such as grain yield is crucial to efficiently train the prediction model and capture genotype-by-environment interactions. High-throughput phenotyping methods have emerged as a potential solution to this bottleneck, with several tools and platforms available for field and laboratory phenotyping. When integrated into a genomic prediction model, high-throughput phenotypic data can substantially increase accuracy; however, there are still constraints to routine use of these approaches including acquisition of multi-environment field data, availability of data management systems that can handle large time-series datasets, and initial costs associated with equipment. As technologies and regulations mature dedicated companies offering high-throughput phenotyping services are expected to emerge. In addition to high-throughput phenotyping better characterization of environmental factors affecting crop performance is necessary for successful implementation of genomic prediction. The authors caution against overreliance on any single technology or approach without considering their limitations and benefits within specific contexts. By avoiding common psychological pitfalls associated with new technologies' integration into established disciplines like breeding programs researchers can harness the full potential of genomic prediction to achieve greater rates of genetic gain in rice and other crops.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

Compare with the PDF

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
Talk about it in public Premium+ Press kit: release, questions, hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.