Ethics of AI: A Systematic Literature Review of Principles and Challenges

Authors: Arif Ali Khan, Sher Badshah, Peng Liang, Bilal Khan, Muhammad Waseem, Mahmood Niazi, Muhammad Azeem Akbar

21 pages, 8 figures
License: CC BY 4.0

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2109.07906v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The implementation of AI or machine intelligence concepts has brought about a technological revolution that is changing both science and society. This transformation has sparked important societal debates about the principles and policies that guide the use and deployment of AI systems. Various organizations have developed ad hoc committees to draft policy documents for AI ethics, resulting in the development of AI policies and guide documents by technology corporates such as SAP and Google, Amnesty International, the Association of Computing Machinery (ACM), Access Now, and others. However, recently published studies report that existing guidelines are not effective or adopted in practice. To address this challenge, Vakkuri et al. used the accountability, responsibility, and transparency (ART) framework to develop a conceptual model exploring ethical considerations in the AI environment. The model was empirically validated through multiple case studies which revealed that while some common concepts were considered when developing AI systems, ethical principles were still not being put into practice. To investigate further agreement on the significance of AI principles and identify challenging factors negatively impacting their adoption, a systematic literature review (SLR) study was conducted. The SLR data revealed 22 global convergence ethical principles with transparency, privacy, accountability, and fairness identified as the most common ones. Additionally, 15 challenges were identified with lack of ethical knowledge and vague principles reported as significant obstacles for considering ethics in AI. The findings from this study provide preliminary inputs for proposing a maturity model that assesses the ethical capabilities of AI systems and provides best practices for further improvements. While there are currently no tools available to measure how well an organization is implementing its AI ethics principles, it is necessary to develop such tools to ensure that ethical considerations are integrated into AI systems. Overall, this study highlights the need for continued efforts to develop effective techniques and tools for successfully scaling AI ethics guidelines into practice.
AI-generated keywords: AI Ethics Guidelines Challenges Maturity Model

AI-generated Key Points

  • AI implementation has brought about a technological revolution that is changing science and society
  • Societal debates about the principles and policies guiding the use and deployment of AI systems have emerged
  • Various organizations have developed ad hoc committees to draft policy documents for AI ethics
  • Existing guidelines are not effective or adopted in practice
  • Vakkuri et al. used the accountability, responsibility, and transparency (ART) framework to develop a conceptual model exploring ethical considerations in the AI environment
  • Empirical validation through multiple case studies revealed that ethical principles were still not being put into practice despite common concepts being considered when developing AI systems
  • A systematic literature review (SLR) study was conducted to investigate further agreement on the significance of AI principles and identify challenging factors negatively impacting their adoption
  • 22 global convergence ethical principles were identified with transparency, privacy, accountability, and fairness as the most common ones
  • 15 challenges were identified with lack of ethical knowledge and vague principles reported as significant obstacles for considering ethics in AI
  • The findings provide preliminary inputs for proposing a maturity model that assesses the ethical capabilities of AI systems and provides best practices for further improvements
  • There are currently no tools available to measure how well an organization is implementing its AI ethics principles
  • It is necessary to develop such tools to ensure that ethical considerations are integrated into AI systems
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: Ethics in AI becomes a global topic of interest for both policymakers and academic researchers. In the last few years, various research organizations, lawyers, think tankers and regulatory bodies get involved in developing AI ethics guidelines and principles. However, there is still debate about the implications of these principles. We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) study to investigate the agreement on the significance of AI principles and identify the challenging factors that could negatively impact the adoption of AI ethics principles. The results reveal that the global convergence set consists of 22 ethical principles and 15 challenges. Transparency, privacy, accountability and fairness are identified as the most common AI ethics principles. Similarly, lack of ethical knowledge and vague principles are reported as the significant challenges for considering ethics in AI. The findings of this study are the preliminary inputs for proposing a maturity model that assess the ethical capabilities of AI systems and provide best practices for further improvements.

Submitted to arXiv on 12 Sep. 2021

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.