AI summary · arXiv: 2102.09218v1 · q-fin.GN

Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance: A cognitive approach

Rania Béji (UM, MRM), Ouidad Yousfi (UM, MRM), Abdelwahed Omri

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 18 Feb. 2021 World Scientific Publisher. Financial and Economic Systems: Transformations & New Challenges, 2020 License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

  • The authors critically review the existing literature on the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate governance features.
  • They develop a theoretical model that explicitly links board diversity, CSR committees' attributes, CSR, and financial performance.
  • Board diversity in terms of gender, ethnicity, age, education level, professional background, and experience can enhance cognitive diversity within boards.
  • Studying the attributes of CSR committees such as their size, composition (e.g., internal vs. external members), mandate (e.g., advisory vs. decision-making), resources (e.g., budget), reporting lines (e.g., to CEO or board), and accountability mechanisms (e.g., monitoring) is crucial for understanding how these committees influence firms' CSR practices.
  • A deeper understanding of the relationship between CSR and corporate governance requires considering not only structural features but also cognitive aspects such as decision-making processes, values, beliefs, and attitudes.
  • This chapter provides practical implications for policymakers interested in promoting responsible business practices by highlighting ways to enhance board diversity and optimize the functioning of CSR committees within organizations.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility Corporate Governance Board Diversity CSR Committees Cognitive Approach

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
In their chapter titled "Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance: A cognitive approach," Rania Béji, Ouidad Yousfi, and Abdelwahed Omri critically review the existing literature on the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate governance features. The authors draw on management and corporate governance theories to develop a theoretical model that explicitly links board diversity, CSR committees' attributes, CSR, and financial performance. They argue that focusing on the cognitive and demographic characteristics of board members can provide more insights into the link between corporate governance and CSR. Additionally, they highlight how the functioning and composition of CSR committees can be valuable in better understanding this relationship. The authors emphasize that a deeper understanding of the relationship between CSR and corporate governance requires considering not only structural features but also cognitive aspects such as decision-making processes, values, beliefs, and attitudes. They suggest that board diversity in terms of gender, ethnicity, age, education level, professional background, and experience can enhance cognitive diversity within boards. This diversity can lead to more effective decision-making processes regarding CSR issues. Furthermore, the authors argue that studying the attributes of CSR committees such as their size, composition (e.g., internal vs. external members), mandate (e.g., advisory vs. decision-making), resources (e.g., budget), reporting lines (e.g., to CEO or board), and accountability mechanisms (e.g., monitoring) is crucial for understanding how these committees influence firms' CSR practices. Overall, this chapter provides a comprehensive overview of how cognitive approaches to corporate governance can shed light on the complex relationship between CSR practices and firm performance. It offers practical implications for policymakers interested in promoting responsible business practices by highlighting ways to enhance board diversity and optimize the functioning of CSR committees within organizations.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Slides to present it
For journalists Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.