Additive manufacturing introduced substructure and computational determination of metamaterials parameters by means of the asymptotic homogenization
Authors: Bilen Emek Abali, Emilio Barchiesi
AI-generated Key Points
- Metamaterials deviate from conventional elasticity and exhibit unique behavior
- Generalized elasticity introduces additional parameters linked to internal length scales
- Asymptotic homogenization approach is used to introduce constitutive parameters for materials with substructures on a macroscopic scale
- Topology optimization in additive manufacturing can create metamaterials with accurately known substructures, reducing weight strategically
- Computational scheme utilizing multiple scales developed by authors Bilen Emek Abali and Emilio Barchiesi for numerically identifying metamaterial parameters
- Approach applied to analyze implications of infill ratio on honeycomb substructure
- Methodology can be applied across various material classes and provides insights into introducing complex substructures through additive manufacturing techniques
- Authors promote transparency in scientific exchange and utilize open-source codes to advance understanding of metamaterials and their potential applications
Abstract: Metamaterials exhibit materials response deviation from conventional elasticity. This phenomenon is captured by the generalized elasticity as a result of extending the theory at the expense of introducing additional parameters. These parameters are linked to internal length scales. Describing on a macroscopic level a material possessing a substructure at a microscopic length scale calls for introducing additional constitutive parameters. Therefore, in principle, an asymptotic homogenization is feasible to determine these parameters given an accurate knowledge on the substructure. Especially in additive manufacturing, known under the infill ratio, topology optimization introduces a substructure leading to higher order terms in mechanical response. Hence, weight reduction creates a metamaterial with an accurately known substructure. Herein, we develop a computational scheme using both scales for numerically identifying metamaterials parameters. As a specific example we apply it on a honeycomb substructure and discuss the infill ratio. Such a computational approach is applicable to a wide class substructures and makes use of open-source codes; we make it publicly available for a transparent scientific exchange.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
We compare the title and abstract with papers indexed in our database. For arXiv papers, we search within the same category; for DOI and other sources, we search across sources and subjects. You can rerun the search as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.