multiple layers of fuzzy logic to quantify vulnerabilies in iot
Authors: Mohammad Shojaeshafiei, Letha Etzkorn, Michael Anderson
AI-generated Key Points
- Quantification of vulnerabilities in network systems and IoT is a contentious issue in network security.
- Extensive research has been conducted, but ambiguities and uncertainties persist in the process.
- A study was conducted to investigate vulnerability quantification within the Department of Transportation (DOT) as a proof of concept.
- Security requirements were identified using Security Quality Requirements Engineering (SQUARE).
- Established security standards like NIST SP-800 and ISO 27001 were used to map out security factors relevant to the DOT's network infrastructure.
- A Multi-layered Fuzzy Logic (MFL) approach based on Goal question Metrics (GQM) was proposed to enhance the quantification process.
- The methodology aims to provide a comprehensive framework for assessing network security and IoT vulnerabilities, particularly focusing on mobile devices within the DOT environment.
- Combining established security standards with innovative approaches like MFL offers a robust framework for evaluating and addressing vulnerabilities within complex network systems.
Abstract: Quantifying vulnerabilities of network systems has been a highly controversial issue in the fields of network security and IoT. Much research has been conducted on this purpose; however, these have many ambiguities and uncertainties. In this paper, we investigate the quantification of vulnerability in the Department of Transportation (DOT) as our proof of concept. We initiate the analysis of security requirements, using Security Quality Requirements Engineering (SQUARE) for security requirements elicitation. Then we apply published security standards such as NIST SP-800 and ISO 27001 to map our security factors and sub-factors. Finally, we propose our Multi-layered Fuzzy Logic (MFL) approach based on Goal question Metrics (GQM) to quantify network security and IoT (Mobile Devices) vulnerability in DOT.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
We compare the title and abstract with papers indexed in our database. For arXiv papers, we search within the same category; for DOI and other sources, we search across sources and subjects. You can rerun the search as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.