Blockchain Architecture forAuditing Automation and TrustBuilding in Public Markets
Authors: Sean Cao, Lin William Cong, Meng Han, Qixuan Hou, Baozhong Yang
AI-generated Key Points
- Traditional reporting, verifying and auditing of business transactions by public firms is labor-intensive and time-consuming
- FutureAB (Future Auditing Blockchain) automates the reporting and auditing process to save time and increase efficiency
- Automation allows auditors to focus on discretionary accounts to better detect and prevent fraud
- Distributed-ledger technologies build investor trust and disrupt the auditing industry
- Multi-functional design of FutureAB allows for transaction verification without a trusted third party while preserving data privacy through a commitment scheme and security through immutability
- Smart contracts and wallets facilitate computerization and implementation of the system on Ethereum network
- Performance evaluation shows that FutureAB is effective in terms of encryption (0.012 seconds per transaction) and verification (0.001 seconds per transaction)
- The blockchain architecture has the potential to revolutionize the auditing industry by streamlining processes, increasing efficiency, reducing costs, enhancing transparency, improving accuracy as well as preventing frauds more effectively than traditional methods
Abstract: Business transactions by public firms are required to be reported, verified, and audited periodically, which is traditionally a labor-intensive and time-consuming process. To streamline this procedure, we design FutureAB (Future Auditing Blockchain) which aims to automate the reporting and auditing process, thereby allowing auditors to focus on discretionary accounts to better detect and prevent fraud. We demonstrate how distributed-ledger technologies build investor trust and disrupt the auditing industry. Our multi-functional design indicates that auditing firms can automate transaction verification without the need for a trusted third party by collaborating and sharing their information while preserving data privacy (commitment scheme) and security (immutability). We also explore how smart contracts and wallets facilitate the computerization and implementation of our system on Ethereum. Finally, performance evaluation reveals the efficacy and scalability of FutureAB in terms of both encryption (0.012 seconds per transaction) and verification (0.001 seconds per transaction).
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
We compare the title and abstract with papers indexed in our database. For arXiv papers, we search within the same category; for DOI and other sources, we search across sources and subjects. You can rerun the search as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.