Towards Socially Responsible AI: Cognitive Bias-Aware Multi-Objective Learning

Authors: Procheta Sen, Debasis Ganguly

AAAI 2020

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2005.06618v2

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
In their paper titled "Towards Socially Responsible AI: Cognitive Bias-Aware Multi-Objective Learning," authors Procheta Sen and Debasis Ganguly address the issue of cognitive biases in human society and their potential impact on AI systems. They propose a bias-aware multi-objective learning framework to combat this problem by reducing the frequency of predicting stereotypes based on identity attributes. Through experiments, they demonstrate how their approach successfully mitigates biases related to gender in emotion prediction tasks. This research highlights the importance of developing socially responsible AI that actively addresses and mitigates cognitive biases present in historical data.
AI-generated keywords: Socially Responsible AI Cognitive Biases Multi-Objective Learning Bias-Aware Framework Ethical AI

AI-generated Key Points

  • Authors Procheta Sen and Debasis Ganguly address cognitive biases in human society and their impact on AI systems
  • They propose a bias-aware multi-objective learning framework to combat biases based on identity attributes
  • Experiments show the approach successfully reduces biases related to gender in emotion prediction tasks
  • The research emphasizes the importance of developing socially responsible AI that actively mitigates cognitive biases from historical data
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: Human society had a long history of suffering from cognitive biases leading to social prejudices and mass injustice. The prevalent existence of cognitive biases in large volumes of historical data can pose a threat of being manifested as unethical and seemingly inhuman predictions as outputs of AI systems trained on such data. To alleviate this problem, we propose a bias-aware multi-objective learning framework that given a set of identity attributes (e.g. gender, ethnicity etc.) and a subset of sensitive categories of the possible classes of prediction outputs, learns to reduce the frequency of predicting certain combinations of them, e.g. predicting stereotypes such as `most blacks use abusive language', or `fear is a virtue of women'. Our experiments conducted on an emotion prediction task with balanced class priors shows that a set of baseline bias-agnostic models exhibit cognitive biases with respect to gender, such as women are prone to be afraid whereas men are more prone to be angry. In contrast, our proposed bias-aware multi-objective learning methodology is shown to reduce such biases in the predictied emotions.

Submitted to arXiv on 14 May. 2020

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.