AI summary · arXiv: 2003.10674v1 · q-fin.RM

Towards Explainability of Machine Learning Models in Insurance Pricing

Kevin Kuo, Daniel Lupton

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 24 Mar. 2020 License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

  • Machine learning methods have gained attention from actuaries, but adoption by practitioners is limited due to lack of transparency compared to generalized linear models.
  • Kevin Kuo and Daniel Lupton propose a framework for explaining machine learning models in insurance pricing.
  • Model interpretability is important in insurance pricing as it allows actuaries to understand and explain factors influencing premium calculations.
  • Machine learning models offer higher predictive accuracy but often lack transparency, hindering their adoption.
  • The proposed framework aims to provide insights into how machine learning models make predictions by identifying key features and relationships contributing to premium calculations.
  • The authors present a case study applying the framework to an insurance dataset and comparing results with a generalized linear model.
  • The framework enhances interpretability by providing clear explanations for each model's predictions.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Machine Learning Interpretability Insurance Pricing Model Explanations Regulatory Compliance

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
Machine learning methods have gained significant attention from actuaries in recent years but their adoption by practitioners has been limited due to the lack of transparency compared to generalized linear models. In their paper titled "Towards Explainability of Machine Learning Models in Insurance Pricing," Kevin Kuo and Daniel Lupton address the need for model interpretability in property and casualty insurance ratemaking. They propose a framework for explaining machine learning models and provide a case study to illustrate its effectiveness. The authors highlight the importance of model interpretability in insurance pricing as it allows actuaries to understand and explain the factors influencing premium calculations. While machine learning models offer higher predictive accuracy than traditional approaches such as generalized linear models, they often lack transparency. This hinders their adoption by practitioners who require clear explanations for regulatory compliance and customer trust. To address this issue, Kuo and Lupton propose a framework for explaining machine learning models used in insurance pricing. The framework aims to provide insights into how these models make predictions by identifying key features and relationships that contribute to premium calculations. By understanding these factors, actuaries can gain confidence in the model's decisions and effectively communicate them to stakeholders. To demonstrate the effectiveness of their framework, the authors present a case study. They apply their approach to an insurance dataset and analyze the results obtained from both a generalized linear model and a machine learning model. Through this comparison, they showcase how their framework enhances interpretability by providing clear explanations for each model's predictions. Overall, this paper emphasizes the need for transparent machine learning models in insurance pricing. The proposed framework offers a solution by providing interpretable insights into complex algorithms.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

Compare with the PDF

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.