Adversarial Impacts on Autonomous Decentralized Lightweight Swarms
Authors: Shaya Wolf, Rafer Cooley, Mike Borowczak
AI-generated Key Points
- Use of swarms in autonomous unmanned vehicles is increasing due to technological advancements
- Swarms exhibit efficient and coordinated behaviors while minimizing computational requirements for each drone
- Susceptibility to external influences is a concern
- Study by Shaya Wolf, Rafer Cooley, and Mike Borowczak explores impacts of adversarial forces on decentralized lightweight swarms
- External influences can compromise swarm functionality, posing risks in scenarios involving human safety or health
- Focus on adversarial swarm using attack vector within movement algorithm of autonomous swarm designed for perimeter surveillance
- Simulations confirmed adversarial swarm could capture significant portions (6-23%) of the perimeter
- Emphasizes importance of understanding and mitigating vulnerabilities in autonomous swarm technologies for safe deployment
Abstract: The decreased size and cost of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and Unmanned Ground Vehicles (UGVs) has enabled the use of swarms of unmanned autonomous vehicles to accomplish a variety of tasks. By utilizing swarming behaviors, it is possible to efficiently accomplish coordinated tasks while minimizing per-drone computational requirements. Some drones rely on decentralized protocols that exhibit emergent behavior across the swarm. While fully decentralized algorithms remove obvious attack vectors their susceptibility to external influence is less understood. This work investigates the influences that can compromise the functionality of an autonomous swarm leading to hazardous situations and cascading vulnerabilities. When a swarm is tasked with missions involving the safety or health of humans, external influences could have serious consequences. The adversarial swarm in this work utilizes an attack vector embedded within the decentralized movement algorithm of a previously defined autonomous swarm designed to create a perimeter sentry swarm. Various simulations confirm the adversarial swarm's ability to capture significant portions (6-23%) of the perimeter.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
We compare the title and abstract with papers indexed in our database. For arXiv papers, we search within the same category; for DOI and other sources, we search across sources and subjects. You can rerun the search as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.